Effect of Bronchoscopy on the Outcome of Patients with Severe Sepsis, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Complicated by Ventilator Associated Pneumonia from Prolonged Ventilation

M. Allam
{"title":"Effect of Bronchoscopy on the Outcome of Patients with Severe Sepsis, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Complicated by Ventilator Associated Pneumonia from Prolonged Ventilation","authors":"M. Allam","doi":"10.2174/18743218-v17-e230110-2022-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n 65% of patients in intensive Care Units (ICU)with severe sepsis and/or severe traumatic lung contusion are complicated with pneumonia and respiratory failure which need long-term ventilation. Sepsis is a common finding in such patients, it is either a cause of ventilator associated pneumonia(VAP) or a complication of VAP. VAP is one of the most common complications of prolonged ventilation. Both diagnostic and therapeutic bronchoscopy could be used to improve the outcome in those patients by controlling septic reactions and improve lung mechanics through clearing of the small airways from purulent discharge.\n \n \n \n To evaluate the effect of the use of bronchoscopy in patients with Acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS), severe sepsis and complicated by VAP as regards, improve the general condition of those patients, improve lung mechanics, control all signs of both VAP and sepsis, accelerate weaning from the ventilator, shorten the duration of ICU stays and its effect on mortality rate in those patients.\n \n \n \n 200 patients were selected after 4 days of ventilation because of ARDS due to either severe traumatic lung contusion or severe lung infection. Those who still showed unresolved ARDS (diagnosed by hypoxic index less than 200, bilateral parenchymatous lung infiltration on the chest X ray , ABG showed PH > 7.30), Severe sepsis diagnosed in our study by >12 SOFA score(Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) and developed VAP diagnosed by >6 CPIS score(clinical pulmonary infection score) included in two groups 100 patients in each. Only patients of group B did three bronchoscopies and BAL sent for culture, while patients of group A continued on the traditional way of management and sputum sent for culture. Improvement of ARDS &VAP, weaning from ventilation, duration of ICU stay, improvement of one/all parameters of both SOFA & CPIS scores, morbidity, and mortality were recorded and compared within 14 days.\n \n \n \n Patients of group B showed significant improvement in APACHII score(acute physiological assessment and chronic health evaluation score), GCS (Glasgow coma scale) , parameters of both SOFA score and CPIS score, hemodynamics parameters, LDH(lactate dehydrogenase), and C-Reactive protein levels. A significant higher number of patients were weaned from the ventilator and discharged from ICU. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the mortality rate.\n \n \n \n The use of bronchoscopy can improve general conditions, control all signs of severe sepsis ,VAP, improve lung mechanics, improve ARDS, accelerate weaning from the ventilator, and shorten the ICU stay but has no effect on mortality rate in those patients with severe sepsis with ARDS and complicated by VAP from prolonged ventilation\n","PeriodicalId":272376,"journal":{"name":"The Open Anesthesiology Journal","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Anesthesiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/18743218-v17-e230110-2022-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

65% of patients in intensive Care Units (ICU)with severe sepsis and/or severe traumatic lung contusion are complicated with pneumonia and respiratory failure which need long-term ventilation. Sepsis is a common finding in such patients, it is either a cause of ventilator associated pneumonia(VAP) or a complication of VAP. VAP is one of the most common complications of prolonged ventilation. Both diagnostic and therapeutic bronchoscopy could be used to improve the outcome in those patients by controlling septic reactions and improve lung mechanics through clearing of the small airways from purulent discharge. To evaluate the effect of the use of bronchoscopy in patients with Acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS), severe sepsis and complicated by VAP as regards, improve the general condition of those patients, improve lung mechanics, control all signs of both VAP and sepsis, accelerate weaning from the ventilator, shorten the duration of ICU stays and its effect on mortality rate in those patients. 200 patients were selected after 4 days of ventilation because of ARDS due to either severe traumatic lung contusion or severe lung infection. Those who still showed unresolved ARDS (diagnosed by hypoxic index less than 200, bilateral parenchymatous lung infiltration on the chest X ray , ABG showed PH > 7.30), Severe sepsis diagnosed in our study by >12 SOFA score(Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) and developed VAP diagnosed by >6 CPIS score(clinical pulmonary infection score) included in two groups 100 patients in each. Only patients of group B did three bronchoscopies and BAL sent for culture, while patients of group A continued on the traditional way of management and sputum sent for culture. Improvement of ARDS &VAP, weaning from ventilation, duration of ICU stay, improvement of one/all parameters of both SOFA & CPIS scores, morbidity, and mortality were recorded and compared within 14 days. Patients of group B showed significant improvement in APACHII score(acute physiological assessment and chronic health evaluation score), GCS (Glasgow coma scale) , parameters of both SOFA score and CPIS score, hemodynamics parameters, LDH(lactate dehydrogenase), and C-Reactive protein levels. A significant higher number of patients were weaned from the ventilator and discharged from ICU. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the mortality rate. The use of bronchoscopy can improve general conditions, control all signs of severe sepsis ,VAP, improve lung mechanics, improve ARDS, accelerate weaning from the ventilator, and shorten the ICU stay but has no effect on mortality rate in those patients with severe sepsis with ARDS and complicated by VAP from prolonged ventilation
支气管镜检查对严重脓毒症合并急性呼吸窘迫综合征合并呼吸机相关性肺炎患者预后的影响
重症监护病房(ICU) 65%的严重脓毒症和/或严重外伤性肺挫伤患者合并肺炎和呼吸衰竭,需要长期通气。脓毒症是这类患者的常见发现,它要么是呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的原因,要么是VAP的并发症。VAP是延长通气最常见的并发症之一。诊断性和治疗性支气管镜检查均可通过控制脓毒性反应和清除小气道中的化脓性分泌物来改善肺力学,从而改善患者的预后。评价支气管镜在急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)、严重脓毒症合并VAP患者中的应用效果,改善患者的一般情况,改善肺力学,控制VAP和脓毒症的所有体征,加快患者脱离呼吸机,缩短患者在ICU的住院时间及其对死亡率的影响。选择200例因严重外伤性肺挫伤或严重肺部感染导致急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS),在通气4天后发生的患者。未解决的ARDS(诊断为缺氧指数小于200,胸片双侧肺实质浸润,ABG显示PH > 7.30),本研究中SOFA评分>12诊断为严重脓毒症,CPIS评分>6诊断为VAP的患者分为两组,每组100例。只有B组患者进行了3次支气管镜检查并送BAL培养,而A组患者继续传统的处理方式,送痰培养。记录并比较14天内ARDS和vap的改善情况、脱离通气、ICU住院时间、SOFA和CPIS评分的一个/所有参数的改善情况、发病率和死亡率。B组患者在APACHII评分(急性生理评估和慢性健康评估评分)、GCS(格拉斯哥昏迷量表)、SOFA评分和CPIS评分参数、血流动力学参数、LDH(乳酸脱氢酶)、c反应蛋白水平均有显著改善。大量患者脱离呼吸机并从ICU出院。两组患者的死亡率无显著差异。支气管镜检查可改善一般情况,控制严重脓毒症和VAP的所有体征,改善肺力学,改善ARDS,加速脱离呼吸机,缩短ICU住院时间,但对严重脓毒症合并ARDS并合并VAP的患者因长时间通气导致的死亡率无影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信