Juridical Theoretical Study Of Granting And Abolition Services Of Encumbrance Rights That Eletronically Integrated

Arba Arba, Sudiarto Sudiarto, Rizky Yunian Sari
{"title":"Juridical Theoretical Study Of Granting And Abolition Services Of Encumbrance Rights That Eletronically Integrated","authors":"Arba Arba, Sudiarto Sudiarto, Rizky Yunian Sari","doi":"10.29303/ulrev.v6i1.207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to examine and analyze the existence of an obligation that every granting and abolition of Encumbrance Rights (roya') must be registered, to examine and analyze the synchronization of legal arrangements for the implementation of registration of granting and abolition of Encumbrance Rights according to UUHT with the Ministry regulation of Agrarian Affairs & ATR Number 9 of 2019, As well as to study and analyze the legal consequences if the granting and abolition of Encumbrance Rights is not registered electronically. This type of research is normative legal research, with the approach method being a statutory approach, conceptual approach, and analytical approach. The results of the research are: 1) that each grant and abolition (roya) of the Encumbrance right must be registered, in accordance with the provisions that the granting and abolition of the Encumbrance must be registered as an absolute requirement and as a fulfillment of the publicity principle in the Law of Encumbrance Right. 2) In the Minister of Agrarian Affairs ATR BPN Number 19 of 2019 there are parts that are not in sync with the Law of Encumbrance Right, electronic documents that are not known in the UUHT and Roya can also be implemented without an agreement that these conditions are not in accordance with the provisions in the UUHT . 3) Legal Consequences If the granting of Encumbrance Rights is not registered, then in the provisions of the Encumbrance Right, the Encumbrance is never born/never existed. If the Encumbrance waranty is never born, then the creditor is not located as a priority creditor (separatist creditor) to get the debtor's debt to be repaid. Likewise, in the abolition of Encumbrance Right (roya), if it is not registered, the Encumbrance Right is considered to have never been erased, so that the waranty remains in the control of the creditor, and the loan agreement or principal agreement has not been paid off and ended. While for the Abolition Process (Roya) of Encumbrance Right as Maintenance of Land Registration Data, if the Encumbrance right certificate has been crossed out, then the land title certificate which is used as waranty for the Encumbrance will be returned to the debtor, while the Encumbrance Right certificate is withdrawn by the Land Office and declared no valid again, as well as the land books of Encumbrance Right is declared no longer valid.","PeriodicalId":406021,"journal":{"name":"Unram Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unram Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29303/ulrev.v6i1.207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to examine and analyze the existence of an obligation that every granting and abolition of Encumbrance Rights (roya') must be registered, to examine and analyze the synchronization of legal arrangements for the implementation of registration of granting and abolition of Encumbrance Rights according to UUHT with the Ministry regulation of Agrarian Affairs & ATR Number 9 of 2019, As well as to study and analyze the legal consequences if the granting and abolition of Encumbrance Rights is not registered electronically. This type of research is normative legal research, with the approach method being a statutory approach, conceptual approach, and analytical approach. The results of the research are: 1) that each grant and abolition (roya) of the Encumbrance right must be registered, in accordance with the provisions that the granting and abolition of the Encumbrance must be registered as an absolute requirement and as a fulfillment of the publicity principle in the Law of Encumbrance Right. 2) In the Minister of Agrarian Affairs ATR BPN Number 19 of 2019 there are parts that are not in sync with the Law of Encumbrance Right, electronic documents that are not known in the UUHT and Roya can also be implemented without an agreement that these conditions are not in accordance with the provisions in the UUHT . 3) Legal Consequences If the granting of Encumbrance Rights is not registered, then in the provisions of the Encumbrance Right, the Encumbrance is never born/never existed. If the Encumbrance waranty is never born, then the creditor is not located as a priority creditor (separatist creditor) to get the debtor's debt to be repaid. Likewise, in the abolition of Encumbrance Right (roya), if it is not registered, the Encumbrance Right is considered to have never been erased, so that the waranty remains in the control of the creditor, and the loan agreement or principal agreement has not been paid off and ended. While for the Abolition Process (Roya) of Encumbrance Right as Maintenance of Land Registration Data, if the Encumbrance right certificate has been crossed out, then the land title certificate which is used as waranty for the Encumbrance will be returned to the debtor, while the Encumbrance Right certificate is withdrawn by the Land Office and declared no valid again, as well as the land books of Encumbrance Right is declared no longer valid.
电子集成留置权授予与撤销服务的法律理论研究
本研究旨在检查和分析是否存在一项义务,即每次授予和取消留置权(roya')都必须进行登记,以检查和分析根据uht实施授予和取消留置权登记的法律安排与农业部法规和2019年第9号ATR的同步。并对留置权的授予和撤销未进行电子登记的法律后果进行了研究和分析。这类研究属于规范性法律研究,研究方法有成文法方法、概念法方法和分析法方法。研究结果如下:1)根据《留置权法》规定,留置权的授予和取消必须作为绝对要求和公开原则的履行进行登记。2)在2019年农业部长ATR BPN第19号中,有些部分与《留置权法》不同步,在uht和Roya中不知道的电子文档也可以在不同意这些条件不符合uht规定的情况下实施。如果留置权的授予未登记,则在《留置权》的规定中,该留置权从未产生/从未存在过。如果负担保证从未诞生,那么债权人不被定位为优先债权人(分离债权人),以获得债务人的债务得到偿还。同样,在留置权(roya)的撤销中,如果未登记,则认为留置权从未被清除,因此保证仍在债权人的控制之下,贷款协议或本金协议尚未清偿和终止。而对于作为土地登记数据维护的留置权的取消程序(Roya),如果留置权证书已被划掉,那么作为留置权担保的土地所有权证书将被归还给债务人,而留置权证书将被土地办公室撤回并再次宣布无效,同时留置权的土地账簿也被宣布不再有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信