Multi-Attribute Approach in Product Design during Group Decision Support Making Process

K. Osman, Mato Perić
{"title":"Multi-Attribute Approach in Product Design during Group Decision Support Making Process","authors":"K. Osman, Mato Perić","doi":"10.23919/SpliTech58164.2023.10193392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research objective of this article was to develop a multi-attribute approach as a tool for group decision-making processes based on the Modular Function Deployment method (MFD) and fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. The first method is used to develop possible product alternatives. The second is used to evaluate the alternatives and select the best one. This approach allows for decision-makers, who are in different locations, to participate in group decisions over the Internet. It also allows for finite choice alternatives that are best in terms of the overall goal. Various priorities should be considered when determining the overall plan. The resulting complexity of the evaluation task requires an approach that, on the one hand, makes it possible to assign a weighting profile to the individual sub-goals and thus shift priorities, but on the other hand also ensures that very different criteria are considered. Since the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method can handle complexity, while fuzzy logic allows dealing with uncertainty factors, the proposed method combines these techniques in an integrated approach. The verification of the research results was carried out on a real example of a complex technical system - an air-cooled chiller. According to the first method, two product alternatives were identified, which were then further evaluated using the second method.","PeriodicalId":361369,"journal":{"name":"2023 8th International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Technologies (SpliTech)","volume":"197 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 8th International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Technologies (SpliTech)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/SpliTech58164.2023.10193392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research objective of this article was to develop a multi-attribute approach as a tool for group decision-making processes based on the Modular Function Deployment method (MFD) and fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. The first method is used to develop possible product alternatives. The second is used to evaluate the alternatives and select the best one. This approach allows for decision-makers, who are in different locations, to participate in group decisions over the Internet. It also allows for finite choice alternatives that are best in terms of the overall goal. Various priorities should be considered when determining the overall plan. The resulting complexity of the evaluation task requires an approach that, on the one hand, makes it possible to assign a weighting profile to the individual sub-goals and thus shift priorities, but on the other hand also ensures that very different criteria are considered. Since the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method can handle complexity, while fuzzy logic allows dealing with uncertainty factors, the proposed method combines these techniques in an integrated approach. The verification of the research results was carried out on a real example of a complex technical system - an air-cooled chiller. According to the first method, two product alternatives were identified, which were then further evaluated using the second method.
群体决策支持过程中产品设计的多属性方法
本文的研究目的是在模块化功能部署方法(MFD)和模糊层次分析法(AHP)的基础上,开发一种多属性方法作为群体决策过程的工具。第一种方法用于开发可能的产品替代品。第二个是用来评估备选方案并选择最佳方案。这种方法允许身处不同位置的决策者通过Internet参与群体决策。它还允许在总体目标方面有有限的选择选择。在确定总体规划时,应考虑各种优先事项。由此产生的评价任务的复杂性需要这样一种方法:一方面,使分配单个子目标的权重概况成为可能,从而转移优先级,但另一方面,也要确保考虑到非常不同的标准。由于层次分析法(AHP)可以处理复杂问题,而模糊逻辑则可以处理不确定因素,因此本文提出的方法将这些技术综合起来。研究结果在一个复杂技术系统的实际实例-风冷式冷水机组上进行了验证。根据第一种方法,确定了两种产品替代品,然后使用第二种方法进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信