TOLSTOVSKY TEXT IN WORKS BY A. BLOK

Valeria V. Kuryanova
{"title":"TOLSTOVSKY TEXT IN WORKS BY A. BLOK","authors":"Valeria V. Kuryanova","doi":"10.37279/2413-1679-2020-6-3-147-164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article, based on the material of A. Blok’s work, examines the elements of the Tolstoyan text as a nominal supertext of literature. It is argued that the basis of this text is the myth of L.N. Tolstoy, which has been actively developing for a century and a half until today, but at the beginning of the 20th century, when Tolstoy’s tragic departure from his own home became popular, it became especially relevant. The structure of the Tolstoyan myth is analyzed, the mythologies associated with it (mythologized constant representations) created and reproduced by A. Blok in accordance with his own poetic worldview, personal attitude to the work and personality of L.N. Tolstoy. In light of the problem posed, the poet’s lyrics, his articles, and correspondence are examined. Attention is focused on the originality of the Tolstoy text in the creative heritage of Blok, based on the proximity of worldviews, the sacralization of the image of the great writer, rejection of criticism and profanation of the image of Tolstoy in contemporary art, journalism and memoirs. Unlike other modernist movements, the Symbolists did not set the task of overthrowing the idols of the past, but on the contrary, they even defended a certain continuity of traditions, all the more so with such an original author as Blok. But the desire to protect Tolstoy from attacks on his authority also makes it possible to develop a biographical myth about the writer. The question is raised about the features of the perception of this myth in the culture and literature of the first third of the XX century.","PeriodicalId":416885,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Notes of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Philological sciences","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Notes of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Philological sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37279/2413-1679-2020-6-3-147-164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article, based on the material of A. Blok’s work, examines the elements of the Tolstoyan text as a nominal supertext of literature. It is argued that the basis of this text is the myth of L.N. Tolstoy, which has been actively developing for a century and a half until today, but at the beginning of the 20th century, when Tolstoy’s tragic departure from his own home became popular, it became especially relevant. The structure of the Tolstoyan myth is analyzed, the mythologies associated with it (mythologized constant representations) created and reproduced by A. Blok in accordance with his own poetic worldview, personal attitude to the work and personality of L.N. Tolstoy. In light of the problem posed, the poet’s lyrics, his articles, and correspondence are examined. Attention is focused on the originality of the Tolstoy text in the creative heritage of Blok, based on the proximity of worldviews, the sacralization of the image of the great writer, rejection of criticism and profanation of the image of Tolstoy in contemporary art, journalism and memoirs. Unlike other modernist movements, the Symbolists did not set the task of overthrowing the idols of the past, but on the contrary, they even defended a certain continuity of traditions, all the more so with such an original author as Blok. But the desire to protect Tolstoy from attacks on his authority also makes it possible to develop a biographical myth about the writer. The question is raised about the features of the perception of this myth in the culture and literature of the first third of the XX century.
托尔斯泰作品中的文本
本文以布洛克的作品材料为基础,考察了托尔斯泰文本作为名义上的文学超文本的要素。有人认为,这篇文章的基础是L.N.托尔斯泰的神话,这已经积极发展了一个半世纪,直到今天,但在20世纪初,当托尔斯泰离开自己的家的悲剧变得流行,它变得特别相关。分析了托尔斯泰神话的结构,布洛克根据自己的诗学世界观、个人对托尔斯泰作品的态度和个性,创造和复制了与之相关的神话(神话化的不断再现)。鉴于所提出的问题,诗人的歌词,他的文章和信件被检查。关注的焦点是布洛克创作遗产中托尔斯泰文本的独创性,基于世界观的接近,伟大作家形象的神圣化,当代艺术,新闻和回忆录中对托尔斯泰形象的批评和亵渎的拒绝。与其他现代主义运动不同,象征主义并没有把推翻过去的偶像作为任务,相反,他们甚至捍卫了传统的某种连续性,尤其是对布洛克这样一位原创性的作者。但是,保护托尔斯泰的权威不受攻击的愿望也使人们有可能发展出关于这位作家的传记神话。问题是,在二十世纪前三分之一的文化和文学中,这个神话的感知特征是什么?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信