Right to Information About, and Involvement in, Environmental Decision Making Along the Silk Road Economic Belt

Kangle Zhang
{"title":"Right to Information About, and Involvement in, Environmental Decision Making Along the Silk Road Economic Belt","authors":"Kangle Zhang","doi":"10.1093/CJCL/CXX004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ecological vulnerability of the regions within the Silk Road Economic Belt requires environmental protection. The infrastructure-pillared structure of the Belt and legal procedures on environmental impact assessment (EIA) of various infrastructures inform the article’s approach to environment protection along the Belt through the right to information about and involvement in environmental decision-making (the right to information and involvement). How to protect this right along the Belt? The rights-approach to environment, as the paper first examines, lead to an exploration of the social and historical background of the adoption of the Convention on Access TO Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (Aarhus Convention). Parties to the Aarhus Convention largely overlap with the countries within the Belt. Critical analysis of the EIA legislation and it in practice, and the contradiction within the principle of “public participation” reveal the inadequacy of formal legislation in protecting the right to information and involvement. A case study on informal participation in environmental decision-making in China illustrates the value of informal participation in protecting this right. Informal participation is forming a communicative form of environment governance in Singapore, in which the right to information and involvement is protected. This article argues that informal participation can facilitate the protection of the right to information and involvement along the Belt.","PeriodicalId":210701,"journal":{"name":"Decision-Making in Public Policy & the Social Good eJournal","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision-Making in Public Policy & the Social Good eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/CJCL/CXX004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

The ecological vulnerability of the regions within the Silk Road Economic Belt requires environmental protection. The infrastructure-pillared structure of the Belt and legal procedures on environmental impact assessment (EIA) of various infrastructures inform the article’s approach to environment protection along the Belt through the right to information about and involvement in environmental decision-making (the right to information and involvement). How to protect this right along the Belt? The rights-approach to environment, as the paper first examines, lead to an exploration of the social and historical background of the adoption of the Convention on Access TO Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (Aarhus Convention). Parties to the Aarhus Convention largely overlap with the countries within the Belt. Critical analysis of the EIA legislation and it in practice, and the contradiction within the principle of “public participation” reveal the inadequacy of formal legislation in protecting the right to information and involvement. A case study on informal participation in environmental decision-making in China illustrates the value of informal participation in protecting this right. Informal participation is forming a communicative form of environment governance in Singapore, in which the right to information and involvement is protected. This article argues that informal participation can facilitate the protection of the right to information and involvement along the Belt.
丝绸之路经济带环境决策的知情权和参与权
丝绸之路经济带区域的生态脆弱性需要环境保护。“一带一路”以基础设施为支柱的结构和各种基础设施环境影响评价的法律程序,为本文提供了通过环境决策的知情权和参与权(知情权和参与权)来保护“一带一路”环境的途径。如何保护这一权利?本文首先考察了环境权利观,探讨了通过《关于获取信息、公众参与决策和在环境问题上诉诸司法的公约》(《奥胡斯公约》)的社会和历史背景。《奥胡斯公约》的缔约国在很大程度上与“一带”内的国家重叠。对环境影响评价立法及其实践的批判性分析,以及“公众参与”原则内部的矛盾,揭示了正式立法在保护知情权和参与权方面的不足。中国非正式参与环境决策的案例研究说明了非正式参与在保护这一权利方面的价值。非正式参与正在形成新加坡环境治理的一种交流形式,在这种形式中,知情权和参与权受到保护。本文认为,非正式参与可以促进“一带一路”沿线的知情权和参与权保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信