Outcomes Associated with Asthma Exacerbations with Respiratory Failure Treated with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

J. Zakrajsek, A. Kannappan, P. Sottile, T. Kiser, R. Allen, Shenxiao Min, M. Althoff, M. Ho, P. Reynolds, E. Burnham, M. Moss, R. Vandivier
{"title":"Outcomes Associated with Asthma Exacerbations with Respiratory Failure Treated with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation","authors":"J. Zakrajsek, A. Kannappan, P. Sottile, T. Kiser, R. Allen, Shenxiao Min, M. Althoff, M. Ho, P. Reynolds, E. Burnham, M. Moss, R. Vandivier","doi":"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2022.205.1_meetingabstracts.a5818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rationale: Asthma affects 20 million adults in the United States resulting in up to 500,000 hospitalizations each year. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for asthma exacerbations requiring invasive ventilation have a mortality of ∼7%. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a salvage technique used in patients with respiratory failure to increase delivery of oxygen, remove CO2 and allow time for recovery. Case series and uncontrolled registry studies have examined benefits of ECMO for asthma exacerbations with respiratory failure, but no studies have examined outcomes associated with use of ECMO for asthma exacerbations compared to standard care. Objective: To assess outcomes associated with use of ECMO during asthma exacerbations requiring invasive ventilation compared to standard care. Methods: Patients were extracted from the Premier Database from 2010-2020 if they had a primary diagnosis of asthma, or a primary diagnosis of respiratory failure with a secondary diagnosis of asthma, and were treated with invasive ventilation. Patients were excluded for age < 18y, no ICU admission, chronic lung disease other than asthma, COVID-19, or if they were not treated with corticosteroids. Hospital mortality was the primary study outcome. Key secondary outcomes included ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, length of invasive ventilation and hospital costs. Differences in outcomes were assessed using propensity score matching at a 1:2 ratio of ECMO versus no ECMO, and by covariate adjustment of the entire study group. Results: A total of 20,494 patients with asthma exacerbations requiring invasive ventilation were included in the study, of which 130 were treated with ECMO and 20,364 were not. After propensity matching, ECMO (N=103) versus no ECMO (N=206) was associated with reduced mortality (11.4% vs. 23.3%, p = 0.017) and increased hospital costs, but no difference in ICU LOS, hospital LOS or length of mechanical ventilation (Table). The covariate-adjusted model replicated these findings (Table). When individual patients were assigned a probability of being treated with ECMO equal to the hospital rate where they were admitted, each 10% increase in the hospital rate of ECMO was associated with no change in the odds of mortality (OR, 1.12: 95% CI, 0.82-1.52), p=0.48). ECMO was also associated with increased renal replacement therapy (P = 0.02), shock (P=0.02) and 30-day all-cause readmission (P = 0.01). Conclusion: ECMO was associated with reduced mortality at the cost of increased morbidity in asthmatics requiring invasive ventilation, indicating that ECMO has the potential to save thousands of lives.","PeriodicalId":360031,"journal":{"name":"C48. MECHANICAL VENTILATION","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"C48. MECHANICAL VENTILATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2022.205.1_meetingabstracts.a5818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Asthma affects 20 million adults in the United States resulting in up to 500,000 hospitalizations each year. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for asthma exacerbations requiring invasive ventilation have a mortality of ∼7%. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a salvage technique used in patients with respiratory failure to increase delivery of oxygen, remove CO2 and allow time for recovery. Case series and uncontrolled registry studies have examined benefits of ECMO for asthma exacerbations with respiratory failure, but no studies have examined outcomes associated with use of ECMO for asthma exacerbations compared to standard care. Objective: To assess outcomes associated with use of ECMO during asthma exacerbations requiring invasive ventilation compared to standard care. Methods: Patients were extracted from the Premier Database from 2010-2020 if they had a primary diagnosis of asthma, or a primary diagnosis of respiratory failure with a secondary diagnosis of asthma, and were treated with invasive ventilation. Patients were excluded for age < 18y, no ICU admission, chronic lung disease other than asthma, COVID-19, or if they were not treated with corticosteroids. Hospital mortality was the primary study outcome. Key secondary outcomes included ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, length of invasive ventilation and hospital costs. Differences in outcomes were assessed using propensity score matching at a 1:2 ratio of ECMO versus no ECMO, and by covariate adjustment of the entire study group. Results: A total of 20,494 patients with asthma exacerbations requiring invasive ventilation were included in the study, of which 130 were treated with ECMO and 20,364 were not. After propensity matching, ECMO (N=103) versus no ECMO (N=206) was associated with reduced mortality (11.4% vs. 23.3%, p = 0.017) and increased hospital costs, but no difference in ICU LOS, hospital LOS or length of mechanical ventilation (Table). The covariate-adjusted model replicated these findings (Table). When individual patients were assigned a probability of being treated with ECMO equal to the hospital rate where they were admitted, each 10% increase in the hospital rate of ECMO was associated with no change in the odds of mortality (OR, 1.12: 95% CI, 0.82-1.52), p=0.48). ECMO was also associated with increased renal replacement therapy (P = 0.02), shock (P=0.02) and 30-day all-cause readmission (P = 0.01). Conclusion: ECMO was associated with reduced mortality at the cost of increased morbidity in asthmatics requiring invasive ventilation, indicating that ECMO has the potential to save thousands of lives.
体外膜氧合治疗哮喘加重伴呼吸衰竭的相关结果
理由:在美国,哮喘影响着2000万成年人,每年导致多达50万人住院治疗。因哮喘加重需要有创通气而入住重症监护病房(ICU)的患者死亡率约为7%。体外膜氧合(ECMO)是一种用于呼吸衰竭患者的抢救技术,以增加氧气的输送,去除二氧化碳,并为恢复留出时间。病例系列研究和非对照登记研究已经检查了ECMO治疗哮喘加重伴呼吸衰竭的益处,但没有研究检查与标准治疗相比,ECMO治疗哮喘加重的相关结果。目的:评估与标准治疗相比,在需要有创通气的哮喘加重期使用ECMO的相关结果。方法:从2010-2020年的Premier数据库中提取原发性诊断为哮喘的患者,或原发性诊断为呼吸衰竭并继发诊断为哮喘的患者,并进行有创通气治疗。排除年龄< 18岁、未入住ICU、哮喘以外的慢性肺部疾病、COVID-19或未使用皮质类固醇治疗的患者。医院死亡率是主要研究结果。主要次要结局包括ICU住院时间(LOS)、医院LOS、有创通气时间和医院费用。采用倾向评分匹配,ECMO与无ECMO的比例为1:2,并通过整个研究组的协变量调整来评估结果的差异。结果:共纳入20,494例需要有创通气的哮喘加重患者,其中130例接受ECMO治疗,20,364例未接受ECMO治疗。倾向匹配后,ECMO (N=103)与未ECMO (N=206)与死亡率降低(11.4%对23.3%,p = 0.017)和医院费用增加相关,但ICU LOS、医院LOS或机械通气时间无差异(表)。协变量调整模型重复了这些发现(表)。当单个患者接受ECMO治疗的概率与他们入院的医院率相等时,ECMO住院率每增加10%与死亡几率没有变化相关(OR, 1.12: 95% CI, 0.82-1.52), p=0.48)。ECMO还与肾脏替代治疗增加(P=0.02)、休克(P=0.02)和30天全因再入院(P= 0.01)相关。结论:ECMO与降低死亡率相关,但代价是需要有创通气的哮喘患者的发病率增加,这表明ECMO有可能挽救数千人的生命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信