THE CZECH CSR REPORTS: TOPICS AND QUALITY OF THEIR PROCESSING

Klára Kašparová
{"title":"THE CZECH CSR REPORTS: TOPICS AND QUALITY OF THEIR PROCESSING","authors":"Klára Kašparová","doi":"10.25142/aak.2018.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From the long-term perspective, Europe as a whole has been\ndescribed as the leader in reporting on socially responsible\nbehaviour. European enterprises consider a compilation of CSR\nreports standard. Also, the quality of information provided is,\ncompared to the surrounding regions, relatively high. However,\nseveral studies show that regional differences exist. In the\nCzech Republic, this type of reporting is still at the initial\nstage of development. Therefore, the first objective of the\nresearch is to find out whether Czech companies provide\ninformation about their social activities and what specific\ntopics they prefer. The second objective is to determine what\nthe quality of provided information is. To carry out this\nresearch, annual reports of 69 companies were assessed. The\npaper uses the method of conceptual content analysis. The\nresults indicate that in their annual reports, companies tend\nto disclose issues beyond what is legally required. The most\ncommon reported topics concern the company’s direction,\ninformation that promote the credibility of information\nprovided and the confidence in the good corporate governance.\nHowever, the results also show that the quality of information\nprovided is not too high.","PeriodicalId":315784,"journal":{"name":"Acta academica karviniensia","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta academica karviniensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25142/aak.2018.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

From the long-term perspective, Europe as a whole has been described as the leader in reporting on socially responsible behaviour. European enterprises consider a compilation of CSR reports standard. Also, the quality of information provided is, compared to the surrounding regions, relatively high. However, several studies show that regional differences exist. In the Czech Republic, this type of reporting is still at the initial stage of development. Therefore, the first objective of the research is to find out whether Czech companies provide information about their social activities and what specific topics they prefer. The second objective is to determine what the quality of provided information is. To carry out this research, annual reports of 69 companies were assessed. The paper uses the method of conceptual content analysis. The results indicate that in their annual reports, companies tend to disclose issues beyond what is legally required. The most common reported topics concern the company’s direction, information that promote the credibility of information provided and the confidence in the good corporate governance. However, the results also show that the quality of information provided is not too high.
捷克企业社会责任报告:主题和处理质量
从长期来看,欧洲作为一个整体被描述为报告社会责任行为的领导者。欧洲企业考虑制定企业社会责任报告标准。此外,与周边地区相比,这里提供的信息质量相对较高。然而,一些研究表明,地区差异是存在的。在捷克共和国,这种类型的报告仍处于发展的初级阶段。因此,研究的第一个目标是找出捷克公司是否提供有关其社交活动的信息以及他们喜欢的具体主题。第二个目标是确定所提供信息的质量。为了开展这项研究,我们对69家公司的年报进行了评估。本文采用概念内容分析法。结果表明,在年度报告中,公司往往会披露超出法律要求的问题。报告中最常见的话题涉及公司的发展方向、促进所提供信息可信度的信息以及对良好公司治理的信心。然而,结果也表明,所提供的信息质量并不太高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信