Instantaneous Frequency and Chirp Rate Estimation for Noisy Quadratic FM Signals by CNN

Huda Saleem, Zahir M. Hussain
{"title":"Instantaneous Frequency and Chirp Rate Estimation for Noisy Quadratic FM Signals by CNN","authors":"Huda Saleem, Zahir M. Hussain","doi":"10.31642/jokmc/2018/100201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deep learning and machine learning are widely employed in various domains. In this paper, Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Convolution Neural Network (CNN) are used to estimate the Instantons Frequency (IF), Linear Chirp Rate (LCR), and Quadratic Chirp Rate (QCR) for Quadratic Frequency Modulated (QFM) signals under Additive White Gaussian (AWG) noise and Additive Symmetric alpha Stable (ASαS) noise. SαS distributions are impulsive noise disturbances except for a few circumstances, lack a closed-form Probability Density Function (PDF), and an infinite second-order statistic. Geometric SNR (GSNR) is used to determine the impulsiveness of mixture noise for Gaussian and SαS noise. ANN is a machine learning classifier with few layers that reduce FE, LCRE, and QCRE complexity and achieve high accuracy. CNN is a deep learning classifier that is built with multiple layers of FE, LCRE, and QCRE. CNN is more accurate than ANN when dealing with large amounts of data and determining optimal features. The results reveal that SαS noise is substantially more damaging to FE, LCRE, and QCRE than Gaussian noise, even when the magnitude is modest, and it is less damaging when alpha is greater than one. After training DCNN for FE, LCRE, and QCRE estimation of QFM signals. The 2D-CNN model accuracy achieved 98.7603 and 1D-CNN is 75.8678 for ten epochs. ANN model accuracy achieved 37.5 for 1000 epochs. The accuracy of TFD (spectrogram & pspectrum) for frequency estimation of QFM signals was 38.4254 by spectrogram and 38.6746 by pspectrum.","PeriodicalId":115908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Kufa for Mathematics and Computer","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Kufa for Mathematics and Computer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31642/jokmc/2018/100201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deep learning and machine learning are widely employed in various domains. In this paper, Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Convolution Neural Network (CNN) are used to estimate the Instantons Frequency (IF), Linear Chirp Rate (LCR), and Quadratic Chirp Rate (QCR) for Quadratic Frequency Modulated (QFM) signals under Additive White Gaussian (AWG) noise and Additive Symmetric alpha Stable (ASαS) noise. SαS distributions are impulsive noise disturbances except for a few circumstances, lack a closed-form Probability Density Function (PDF), and an infinite second-order statistic. Geometric SNR (GSNR) is used to determine the impulsiveness of mixture noise for Gaussian and SαS noise. ANN is a machine learning classifier with few layers that reduce FE, LCRE, and QCRE complexity and achieve high accuracy. CNN is a deep learning classifier that is built with multiple layers of FE, LCRE, and QCRE. CNN is more accurate than ANN when dealing with large amounts of data and determining optimal features. The results reveal that SαS noise is substantially more damaging to FE, LCRE, and QCRE than Gaussian noise, even when the magnitude is modest, and it is less damaging when alpha is greater than one. After training DCNN for FE, LCRE, and QCRE estimation of QFM signals. The 2D-CNN model accuracy achieved 98.7603 and 1D-CNN is 75.8678 for ten epochs. ANN model accuracy achieved 37.5 for 1000 epochs. The accuracy of TFD (spectrogram & pspectrum) for frequency estimation of QFM signals was 38.4254 by spectrogram and 38.6746 by pspectrum.
基于CNN的含噪二次调频信号瞬时频率和啁啾率估计
深度学习和机器学习被广泛应用于各个领域。本文利用人工神经网络(ANN)和卷积神经网络(CNN)对二次调频(QFM)信号在加性高斯白噪声(AWG)和加性对称α稳定噪声(ASαS)下的瞬时频率(IF)、线性啁啾率(LCR)和二次啁啾率(QCR)进行估计。除少数情况外,SαS分布是脉冲噪声扰动,缺乏闭型概率密度函数(PDF)和无限二阶统计量。采用几何信噪比(GSNR)来确定高斯噪声和SαS噪声混合噪声的冲量。ANN是一种层数较少的机器学习分类器,可以降低FE、lcr和QCRE的复杂性,并达到较高的准确率。CNN是一个深度学习分类器,由多层FE、lcr和QCRE构建而成。在处理大量数据和确定最优特征时,CNN比ANN更准确。结果表明,s - α s噪声对FE、lcr和QCRE的破坏程度明显大于高斯噪声,即使α α s噪声的强度不高,α α s噪声对FE、lcr和QCRE的破坏程度小于高斯噪声。训练后的DCNN用于QFM信号的FE、lcr和QCRE估计。2D-CNN模型精度达到98.7603,1D-CNN模型精度为75.8678。人工神经网络模型1000次精度达到37.5。TFD(谱图和谱)对QFM信号的频率估计精度分别为38.4254和38.6746。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信