Involuntary Embarrassing Exposures in Online Social Networks: A Replication Study

Mohammadreza Ebrahimi, J. D. Martinez
{"title":"Involuntary Embarrassing Exposures in Online Social Networks: A Replication Study","authors":"Mohammadreza Ebrahimi, J. D. Martinez","doi":"10.17705/1ATRR.00039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we carry out a methodological replication of the research done by Choi et al. (2015) published in Information System Research. In the original study, the authors integrate the privacy and teasing literatures under a social exchange framework to understand online involuntary exposures. The original study was conducted on students from Southeast Asia. Our study uses a significantly larger sample of college students in the United States. Our replication results show that whereas most of the hypotheses supported by the original results on behavioral responses replicate with high consistency (8 out of 12 hypotheses), the results that deal with the effects of network commonality on perceived privacy invasion and perceived relationship bonding did not replicate (4 out of 12 hypotheses). These results could stem from a failed manipulation of network commonality. We look into the possible rationales for this and show what would be an effective manipulation in our context. Further, we expand the original study by testing an additional embarrassing scenario catered to our subject pool. The results suggest that perceived privacy invasion and perceived relationship bonding affect individual’s behavioral responses to embarrassing exposures.","PeriodicalId":146711,"journal":{"name":"AIS Trans. Replication Res.","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIS Trans. Replication Res.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17705/1ATRR.00039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this study, we carry out a methodological replication of the research done by Choi et al. (2015) published in Information System Research. In the original study, the authors integrate the privacy and teasing literatures under a social exchange framework to understand online involuntary exposures. The original study was conducted on students from Southeast Asia. Our study uses a significantly larger sample of college students in the United States. Our replication results show that whereas most of the hypotheses supported by the original results on behavioral responses replicate with high consistency (8 out of 12 hypotheses), the results that deal with the effects of network commonality on perceived privacy invasion and perceived relationship bonding did not replicate (4 out of 12 hypotheses). These results could stem from a failed manipulation of network commonality. We look into the possible rationales for this and show what would be an effective manipulation in our context. Further, we expand the original study by testing an additional embarrassing scenario catered to our subject pool. The results suggest that perceived privacy invasion and perceived relationship bonding affect individual’s behavioral responses to embarrassing exposures.
在线社交网络中的非自愿尴尬暴露:一项复制研究
在本研究中,我们对Choi等人(2015)发表在《信息系统研究》上的研究进行了方法学复制。在最初的研究中,作者在社会交换框架下整合隐私和戏弄文献来理解网络非自愿暴露。最初的研究对象是来自东南亚的学生。我们的研究使用了大量的美国大学生样本。我们的复制结果表明,虽然大多数由原始结果支持的关于行为反应的假设具有高一致性(12个假设中有8个),但处理网络共性对感知隐私侵犯和感知关系联系的影响的结果没有复制(12个假设中有4个)。这些结果可能源于对网络共性操作的失败。我们将研究可能的基本原理,并展示在我们的环境中什么是有效的操作。此外,我们通过测试一个额外的尴尬场景来扩展原始研究,以迎合我们的受试者群体。结果表明,感知到的隐私侵犯和感知到的关系联系影响个体对尴尬暴露的行为反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信