The Economic Family in Global Context: A Case Study of Migrant Domestic Workers in Egypt

Chantal Thomas
{"title":"The Economic Family in Global Context: A Case Study of Migrant Domestic Workers in Egypt","authors":"Chantal Thomas","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1639120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay links a particular legal case study with a broader set of questions about the “family” in global political and economic context. Part I of this essay clarifies the analytic links between the household, the market and globalization. By studying Egypt, the essay focuses on one part of this global sociolegal continuum and draws out the special significance of transnational background rules and conditions for the “developmental state.” Part II presents my case study of the legal framework affecting labor conditions of sub-Saharan African women who are migrant domestic workers in Egypt, and particularly the legal framework that affects their ability to bargain in securing livelihood strategies. Domestic and international law fail to provide adequate assistance and support for these efforts, but they indelibly construct the environments for them: “foreground” rules of employment and contract law (but not family law) affect the bargaining environment for migrant domestic workers; “background” rules, most importantly those related to sovereignty and immigration, also crucially influence the bargaining environment. Part III returns to the conceptual landscape, connecting this study with critical understandings of the “economic family” and current quandaries in “global governance” studies. In conclusion, the household is not only an economically significant site, but is also linked to patterns of globalization: governance of the household constitutes an aspect of “global governance,” and vice versa. Such a conclusion may require rethinking some assumptions about gender roles and power dynamics that have characterized legal theories of the family.","PeriodicalId":177971,"journal":{"name":"Economic Perspectives on Employment & Labor Law eJournal","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Perspectives on Employment & Labor Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1639120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This essay links a particular legal case study with a broader set of questions about the “family” in global political and economic context. Part I of this essay clarifies the analytic links between the household, the market and globalization. By studying Egypt, the essay focuses on one part of this global sociolegal continuum and draws out the special significance of transnational background rules and conditions for the “developmental state.” Part II presents my case study of the legal framework affecting labor conditions of sub-Saharan African women who are migrant domestic workers in Egypt, and particularly the legal framework that affects their ability to bargain in securing livelihood strategies. Domestic and international law fail to provide adequate assistance and support for these efforts, but they indelibly construct the environments for them: “foreground” rules of employment and contract law (but not family law) affect the bargaining environment for migrant domestic workers; “background” rules, most importantly those related to sovereignty and immigration, also crucially influence the bargaining environment. Part III returns to the conceptual landscape, connecting this study with critical understandings of the “economic family” and current quandaries in “global governance” studies. In conclusion, the household is not only an economically significant site, but is also linked to patterns of globalization: governance of the household constitutes an aspect of “global governance,” and vice versa. Such a conclusion may require rethinking some assumptions about gender roles and power dynamics that have characterized legal theories of the family.
全球背景下的经济家庭:以埃及移徙家政工人为例
这篇文章将一个特定的法律案例研究与全球政治和经济背景下关于“家庭”的一系列更广泛的问题联系起来。本文第一部分阐述了家庭、市场与全球化的分析联系。通过对埃及的研究,本文将重点放在这个全球社会法律连续体的一部分,并得出跨国背景规则和条件对“发展国家”的特殊意义。第二部分介绍了我对影响撒哈拉以南非洲妇女劳动条件的法律框架的案例研究,这些妇女是埃及的移民家庭工人,特别是影响她们在确保生计战略中讨价还价能力的法律框架。国内法和国际法未能为这些努力提供足够的帮助和支持,但它们不可避免地为他们构建了环境:就业和合同法的“前景”规则(但不是家庭法)影响移徙家政工人的谈判环境;“背景”规则,最重要的是那些与主权和移民有关的规则,也对谈判环境产生了至关重要的影响。第三部分回归到概念景观,将本研究与对“经济家庭”的批判性理解和“全球治理”研究中的当前困境联系起来。总之,家庭不仅是一个经济上重要的场所,而且还与全球化的模式相联系:家庭的治理构成了“全球治理”的一个方面,反之亦然。这样的结论可能需要重新考虑作为家庭法律理论特征的关于性别角色和权力动态的一些假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信