On the resilience of software defined routing platform

P. Zeng, K. Nguyen, Yao Shen, S. Yamada
{"title":"On the resilience of software defined routing platform","authors":"P. Zeng, K. Nguyen, Yao Shen, S. Yamada","doi":"10.1109/APNOMS.2014.6996605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in Software Defined Networking (SDN)/OpenFlow, which is a novel network architecture splitting control and data planes. The SDN-enabled products have also been widely deployed in many production networks aiming to bypass the limitations of current Internet architecture. There are several efforts on building Software Defined Routing Platform (SDRP), which integrates SDN/OpenFlow within IP routing. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are a few successful works on realizing SDRP despite of the flexibility and rich features of SDN. In this paper, we investigate state-of-the-art works towards SDRP. We have evaluated the performance of a mainstream SDRP named RouteFlow. Our evaluations have been conducted using both the emulator Mininet and a real testbed with physical switches. Different to other works, we focus on the resilience aspect of the routing platform. The evaluation results show that RouteFlow is resilient against both single and multiple link failures. Additionally, OSPF provided by RouteFlow achieves a shorter failover time than the legacy OSPF. In the case of RIPv2, RouteFlow's protocol has a comparable performance value with the distributed one.","PeriodicalId":269952,"journal":{"name":"The 16th Asia-Pacific Network Operations and Management Symposium","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The 16th Asia-Pacific Network Operations and Management Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APNOMS.2014.6996605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in Software Defined Networking (SDN)/OpenFlow, which is a novel network architecture splitting control and data planes. The SDN-enabled products have also been widely deployed in many production networks aiming to bypass the limitations of current Internet architecture. There are several efforts on building Software Defined Routing Platform (SDRP), which integrates SDN/OpenFlow within IP routing. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are a few successful works on realizing SDRP despite of the flexibility and rich features of SDN. In this paper, we investigate state-of-the-art works towards SDRP. We have evaluated the performance of a mainstream SDRP named RouteFlow. Our evaluations have been conducted using both the emulator Mininet and a real testbed with physical switches. Different to other works, we focus on the resilience aspect of the routing platform. The evaluation results show that RouteFlow is resilient against both single and multiple link failures. Additionally, OSPF provided by RouteFlow achieves a shorter failover time than the legacy OSPF. In the case of RIPv2, RouteFlow's protocol has a comparable performance value with the distributed one.
软件定义路由平台的弹性研究
软件定义网络(SDN)/OpenFlow是一种分离控制平面和数据平面的新型网络架构,近年来受到越来越多的关注。支持sdn的产品也被广泛部署在许多生产网络中,旨在绕过当前Internet架构的限制。在构建软件定义路由平台(SDRP)方面有一些努力,它在IP路由中集成了SDN/OpenFlow。然而,据我们所知,尽管SDN具有灵活性和丰富的特性,但实现SDRP的成功作品很少。在本文中,我们研究了最新的研究成果。我们已经评估了一个名为RouteFlow的主流SDRP的性能。我们的评估是使用仿真器Mininet和物理交换机的真实测试平台进行的。与其他工作不同,我们重点关注路由平台的弹性方面。评估结果表明,RouteFlow对单链路和多链路故障都具有弹性。此外,RouteFlow提供的OSPF实现了比传统OSPF更短的故障转移时间。在RIPv2的情况下,RouteFlow协议与分布式协议具有相当的性能值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信