Poking the bear: lessons learned from probing three Android malware datasets

Aleieldin Salem, A. Pretschner
{"title":"Poking the bear: lessons learned from probing three Android malware datasets","authors":"Aleieldin Salem, A. Pretschner","doi":"10.1145/3243218.3243222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To counter the continuous threat posed by Android malware, we attempted to devise a novel method based on active learning. Nonetheless, evaluating our active learning based method on three different Android malware datasets resulted in performance discrepancies. In an attempt to explain such inconsistencies, we postulated research questions and designed corresponding experiments to answer them. The results of our experiments unveiled the reasons behind the struggles of our method and, more importantly, revealed some limitations with the current Android malware detection methods that, we fear, can be leveraged by malware authors to evade detection. In this paper, we share with the research community our research questions, experiments, and findings to instigate researchers to devise methods to tackle such limitations.","PeriodicalId":324676,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Advances in Mobile App Analysis","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Advances in Mobile App Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3243218.3243222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

To counter the continuous threat posed by Android malware, we attempted to devise a novel method based on active learning. Nonetheless, evaluating our active learning based method on three different Android malware datasets resulted in performance discrepancies. In an attempt to explain such inconsistencies, we postulated research questions and designed corresponding experiments to answer them. The results of our experiments unveiled the reasons behind the struggles of our method and, more importantly, revealed some limitations with the current Android malware detection methods that, we fear, can be leveraged by malware authors to evade detection. In this paper, we share with the research community our research questions, experiments, and findings to instigate researchers to devise methods to tackle such limitations.
戳熊:探测三个Android恶意软件数据集的经验教训
为了应对Android恶意软件带来的持续威胁,我们尝试设计一种基于主动学习的新方法。尽管如此,在三种不同的Android恶意软件数据集上评估我们基于主动学习的方法会导致性能差异。为了解释这种不一致,我们假设了研究问题,并设计了相应的实验来回答这些问题。我们的实验结果揭示了我们的方法难以实现的原因,更重要的是,揭示了当前Android恶意软件检测方法的一些局限性,我们担心这些局限性可能被恶意软件作者利用来逃避检测。在本文中,我们与研究界分享我们的研究问题,实验和发现,以激励研究人员设计方法来解决这些限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信