Echo chambers, confirmation bias and polarization of ideas: how scientific and non-scientific knowledge spreads around the Web 2.0

Maria Rinaldi Miliani, G. Quintaliani
{"title":"Echo chambers, confirmation bias and polarization of ideas: how scientific and non-scientific knowledge spreads around the Web 2.0","authors":"Maria Rinaldi Miliani, G. Quintaliani","doi":"10.5301/GTND.2017.17774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The internet, whether one likes it or not, has become one of the principal means of access to scientific and non-scientific knowledge. The mechanisms regulating the dissemination of facts and information online are complex and partially unknown. For some of them, such as confirmation bias and polarization, specific mathematical models have been provided. Although a lot of work still needs to be done, it is already possible to develop strategic behaviors aimed at countering disinformation. Anyone who works in the medical field or in science in general must not ignore these themes, because they are likely to become the foundation of future health communication and reliable scientific knowledge distribution online.","PeriodicalId":140919,"journal":{"name":"Giornale di Techniche Nefrologiche e Dialitiche","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Giornale di Techniche Nefrologiche e Dialitiche","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5301/GTND.2017.17774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The internet, whether one likes it or not, has become one of the principal means of access to scientific and non-scientific knowledge. The mechanisms regulating the dissemination of facts and information online are complex and partially unknown. For some of them, such as confirmation bias and polarization, specific mathematical models have been provided. Although a lot of work still needs to be done, it is already possible to develop strategic behaviors aimed at countering disinformation. Anyone who works in the medical field or in science in general must not ignore these themes, because they are likely to become the foundation of future health communication and reliable scientific knowledge distribution online.
回音室,确认偏差和思想的两极分化:科学和非科学知识如何在Web 2.0中传播
不管人们喜欢与否,互联网已经成为获取科学和非科学知识的主要手段之一。规范网上事实和信息传播的机制是复杂的,部分是未知的。对于其中的一些,如确认偏误和极化,给出了具体的数学模型。尽管还有很多工作要做,但已经有可能制定旨在打击虚假信息的战略行为。任何在医学领域或一般科学领域工作的人都不能忽视这些主题,因为它们很可能成为未来健康传播和可靠的科学知识在线传播的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信