Luis M. Romero-Rodríguez, Sabina Civila, Ignacio Aguaded
{"title":"Otherness as a form of intersubjective social exclusion: Conceptual discussion from the current communicative scenario","authors":"Luis M. Romero-Rodríguez, Sabina Civila, Ignacio Aguaded","doi":"10.1108/jices-11-2019-0130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to review the theory based on «otherness» as a form of social exclusion and symbolic violence from the constructions of realities of the media, with particular emphasis on the ethics and aesthetics of language and its role in materializing identity differences.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA search for specific criteria and boolean algorithms is carried out in Web of Science and Scopus on «otherness» [AND] «social exclusion», to then submit the emerging results to a co-occurrence matrix by citations with VOSViewer v. 1.6.13. From the relation tree of the most cited documents [min = 7] of the downloaded articles, a critical/analytical reading is made.\n\n\nFindings\n«Otherness» is reviewed to a greater extent from a Western perspective, and more specifically, from a Eurocentric one. This implies that the study of «otherness» is not sufficiently analyzed by Asian or African authors, who are excluded from the analysis. In this sense, «otherness» is understood as a theoretical construct and as any symbolic construction of the other (phenotypically, but also in ideology, values and customs), but which carries a load of stereotypes that can become polarization, demonization, ergo and violence.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nRevisiting «otherness» as an informative construct becomes imperative in light of the emergence of extremist groups and xenophobic parties, as well as separatist policies such as Brexit or the Catalan split in Spain. Few articles contribute to elaborating a complete conceptual construct on «otherness» as an epistemological category of communication and information, so this research effort attempts to compile its theoretical discussion.\n","PeriodicalId":156416,"journal":{"name":"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jices-11-2019-0130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to review the theory based on «otherness» as a form of social exclusion and symbolic violence from the constructions of realities of the media, with particular emphasis on the ethics and aesthetics of language and its role in materializing identity differences.
Design/methodology/approach
A search for specific criteria and boolean algorithms is carried out in Web of Science and Scopus on «otherness» [AND] «social exclusion», to then submit the emerging results to a co-occurrence matrix by citations with VOSViewer v. 1.6.13. From the relation tree of the most cited documents [min = 7] of the downloaded articles, a critical/analytical reading is made.
Findings
«Otherness» is reviewed to a greater extent from a Western perspective, and more specifically, from a Eurocentric one. This implies that the study of «otherness» is not sufficiently analyzed by Asian or African authors, who are excluded from the analysis. In this sense, «otherness» is understood as a theoretical construct and as any symbolic construction of the other (phenotypically, but also in ideology, values and customs), but which carries a load of stereotypes that can become polarization, demonization, ergo and violence.
Originality/value
Revisiting «otherness» as an informative construct becomes imperative in light of the emergence of extremist groups and xenophobic parties, as well as separatist policies such as Brexit or the Catalan split in Spain. Few articles contribute to elaborating a complete conceptual construct on «otherness» as an epistemological category of communication and information, so this research effort attempts to compile its theoretical discussion.
本研究旨在回顾基于“他者性”作为社会排斥和象征暴力形式的理论,并特别强调语言的伦理和美学及其在物质化身份差异中的作用。设计/方法/方法在Web of Science和Scopus中对“otherness”[and]“social exclusion”进行特定标准和布尔算法的搜索,然后通过引用VOSViewer v. 1.6.13将出现的结果提交到共现矩阵中。根据下载文章中被引用次数最多的文献[min = 7]的关系树,进行批判性/分析性阅读。“他性”在很大程度上是从西方的角度来审视的,更具体地说,是从欧洲中心的角度来审视的。这意味着亚洲或非洲作者对“他者性”的研究没有进行充分的分析,他们被排除在分析之外。在这个意义上,“他者性”被理解为一种理论建构,以及对他者的任何象征性建构(在表型上,但也在意识形态、价值观和习俗中),但它承载着大量的刻板印象,这些刻板印象可能成为两极分化、妖魔化、因此和暴力。鉴于极端主义团体和仇外政党的出现,以及英国脱欧或西班牙加泰罗尼亚分裂等分离主义政策,将“他者性”作为一种信息结构进行访问变得势在必行。很少有文章对“他者”作为交流和信息的认识论范畴的完整概念结构做出贡献,因此本研究试图汇编其理论讨论。