Adjudication enforcement: partial final determinations and insolvency

Heath Marshall
{"title":"Adjudication enforcement: partial final determinations and insolvency","authors":"Heath Marshall","doi":"10.1108/17561451211211741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine two specific circumstances where UK courts may stay the execution of a judgment to enforce a statutory adjudication decision; where a final decision is sought on a discrete point; and where the winning party is insolvent. In this context, there is consideration of what a “binding” decision means for the purposes of Part II of the Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act 1996.Design/methodology/approach – A black letter, doctrinal approach is adopted, using two High Court decisions as a focus for wider critical reflection.Findings – The cases where a final determination on part of an adjudication decision is successful are rare and will depend on the facts. Despite some unorthodox recent decisions, the likelihood remains that parties will struggle to challenge part only of an adjudication decision. The leading case authorities support the underlying principle of the Construction Act insofar as adjudication decisions are binding and should be enforce...","PeriodicalId":158465,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law in The Built Environment","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law in The Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/17561451211211741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine two specific circumstances where UK courts may stay the execution of a judgment to enforce a statutory adjudication decision; where a final decision is sought on a discrete point; and where the winning party is insolvent. In this context, there is consideration of what a “binding” decision means for the purposes of Part II of the Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act 1996.Design/methodology/approach – A black letter, doctrinal approach is adopted, using two High Court decisions as a focus for wider critical reflection.Findings – The cases where a final determination on part of an adjudication decision is successful are rare and will depend on the facts. Despite some unorthodox recent decisions, the likelihood remains that parties will struggle to challenge part only of an adjudication decision. The leading case authorities support the underlying principle of the Construction Act insofar as adjudication decisions are binding and should be enforce...
裁决执行:部分终局裁定和破产
目的-本文的目的是审查英国法院可能暂停执行判决以执行法定裁决决定的两种具体情况;在一个离散点上寻求最终决定;而获胜的一方是破产的。在这方面,考虑到“有约束力”的决定对于《1996年住房补助建设和重建法》第二部分的目的意味着什么。设计/方法/方法-采用黑体字,理论方法,使用两个高等法院的判决作为更广泛的批判性反思的焦点。调查结果-对裁决决定的一部分作出最终决定是成功的情况很少,将取决于事实。尽管最近做出了一些非正统的决定,但当事人仍有可能难以对判决的部分决定提出质疑。主要案件当局支持《建筑法》的基本原则,因为裁决决定具有约束力,应该得到执行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信