Indian Labor and New World Plantations: European Demands and Indian Responses in Northeastern Brazil

S. Schwartz
{"title":"Indian Labor and New World Plantations: European Demands and Indian Responses in Northeastern Brazil","authors":"S. Schwartz","doi":"10.1086/AHR/83.1.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IN RECENT YEARS INTEREST in the early years of European conquest and colonization in the New World has undergone remarkable resurgence. No longer concerned solely or primarily with the effect of this process on subsequent national histories, scholars have increasingly turned their attention to the role that the New World colonies played in the creation of an Atlanticeven a world-economic system. This resurgence of interest has resulted in lengthy and often heated debates on the nature of colonization in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries and on the dominant mode of production which prevailed in these colonies. Recently, Immanuel Wallerstein has argued that the Americas, as a peripheral zone of capitalist expansion, experienced certain forms of coerced labor such as chattel slavery and the encomienda, both of which were necessary forms of colonial exploitation that permitted the formation of a surplus sufficient to make such colonial ventures worthwhile.1 A Brazilian scholar, Fernando Novais, has even suggested that European merchants seeking high returns on investments were responsible for imposition of the Atlantic slave trade and that the slave trade created African slavery in the","PeriodicalId":104249,"journal":{"name":"Plantation Societies in the Era of European Expansion","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plantation Societies in the Era of European Expansion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/AHR/83.1.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

IN RECENT YEARS INTEREST in the early years of European conquest and colonization in the New World has undergone remarkable resurgence. No longer concerned solely or primarily with the effect of this process on subsequent national histories, scholars have increasingly turned their attention to the role that the New World colonies played in the creation of an Atlanticeven a world-economic system. This resurgence of interest has resulted in lengthy and often heated debates on the nature of colonization in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries and on the dominant mode of production which prevailed in these colonies. Recently, Immanuel Wallerstein has argued that the Americas, as a peripheral zone of capitalist expansion, experienced certain forms of coerced labor such as chattel slavery and the encomienda, both of which were necessary forms of colonial exploitation that permitted the formation of a surplus sufficient to make such colonial ventures worthwhile.1 A Brazilian scholar, Fernando Novais, has even suggested that European merchants seeking high returns on investments were responsible for imposition of the Atlantic slave trade and that the slave trade created African slavery in the
印第安劳工和新世界种植园:巴西东北部欧洲人的要求和印第安人的反应
近年来,对欧洲早期在新大陆的征服和殖民的兴趣有了显著的复苏。学者们不再仅仅或主要关注这一过程对随后的国家历史的影响,而是越来越多地将注意力转向新大陆殖民地在建立大西洋乃至世界经济体系中所起的作用。这种兴趣的复苏导致了关于16世纪和17世纪殖民的性质以及在这些殖民地盛行的主要生产方式的漫长而激烈的辩论。最近,伊曼纽尔·沃勒斯坦(Immanuel Wallerstein)认为,作为资本主义扩张的外围地区,美洲经历了某些形式的强迫劳动,如动产奴隶制和农奴制,这两种形式都是殖民剥削的必要形式,它们允许形成足够的盈余,使这种殖民冒险值得巴西学者费尔南多·诺维斯(Fernando Novais)甚至提出,寻求高投资回报的欧洲商人对大西洋奴隶贸易的实施负有责任,而奴隶贸易在20世纪80年代造成了非洲奴隶制
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书