Taxation and Pricing of Intangibles

A. Ross
{"title":"Taxation and Pricing of Intangibles","authors":"A. Ross","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2722836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research paper, by Alan Ross, was commissioned by the Singapore Tax Academy and SMU Centre of Excellence for Taxation. Alan was previously Head of Tax at PwC Singapore and held a number of leadership positions within PwC overseas prior to Singapore. He has over 30 years experience in International Tax and Transfer Pricing including major issues relating to the taxation of intangibles. The paper first addresses the importance of intangibles in terms of their massive contribution to corporate values in recent years. The relative ease of migrating ownership of intangibles from one jurisdiction to another, possibly lower tax jurisdiction, highlights the concern of many tax authorities. These authorities naturally want their fair share of taxes from the profits generated by such important value drivers where these are wholly or partly situated in their respective jurisdictions. This also explains the significant focus on intangibles in the OECD’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) work. It should however be noted that this paper was issued shortly before the final BEPS papers were issued by the OECD in October 2015. While nothing fundamental should be changed as a result of the final OECD recommendations, the paper has not been updated for those. The paper focuses significantly on the issues raised by the BEPS project including addressing frameworks for analysing intangibles transactions, the importance of contractual terms and their consistency with actual conduct and functions and of course, the need to allocate intangible profits to those locations where the substantive value creating functions are undertaken. In this respect the so-called “DEMPE” functions are addressed (i.e. Development, Enhancement, Maintenance, Protection and Exploitation) and usefully illustrated by the author with practical real life examples detailing how the intangibles process can be mapped out to identify the truly important functions and risks, the range of values that might be attached to those and where they are carried out or in substance reside. Methodologies for pricing various intangibles transactions are explored in some depth including the availability (or lack thereof) of good third party comparables and the usefulness and limitations of publicly available databases in searching for the same. Comparable Profits methods and Profit Split methodologies are also discussed again noting the practical difficulties associated with applying such methods to unique intangibles. The pricing methods are usefully linked by the author to various methods for valuing intangibles as these should clearly be consistent with the pricing of individual intangible transactions and vice versa. The valuations section covers cost based, market based and income-based approaches to valuations, forecasting issues and discounted cash flow models including the use of Capital Asset Pricing Models (CAPM). The paper also explores some of the difficulties in valuing early stage technologies and goes on to address more sophisticated approaches such as the use of Real Options and Game Theory. A practical section linked to detailed country Appendices addresses how various Asian and Western countries presently approach certain intangible transactions including the sale or purchase of intangibles, licensing of intangibles and cost sharing. The section explains some of the barriers and uncertainty of tax treatment that often exists especially in developing nations. The paper concludes with a brief commentary on so-called Patent Box regimes that have been introduced in a number of countries and discusses the proposed moderation to such regimes in the “Nexus” approach put forward by the OECD. A number of PwC participants from Singapore and around the world helped with certain sections of the paper and provided input for the country responses that were summarised and incorporated into the data provided in Appendices 3 and 4. The author extends his sincere thanks to them. Similarly, thanks were also extended to Daryl Tan Junyang, a student at SMU who contributed research to several sections.","PeriodicalId":138031,"journal":{"name":"Singapore Management University School of Accountancy Research Paper Series","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Singapore Management University School of Accountancy Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2722836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research paper, by Alan Ross, was commissioned by the Singapore Tax Academy and SMU Centre of Excellence for Taxation. Alan was previously Head of Tax at PwC Singapore and held a number of leadership positions within PwC overseas prior to Singapore. He has over 30 years experience in International Tax and Transfer Pricing including major issues relating to the taxation of intangibles. The paper first addresses the importance of intangibles in terms of their massive contribution to corporate values in recent years. The relative ease of migrating ownership of intangibles from one jurisdiction to another, possibly lower tax jurisdiction, highlights the concern of many tax authorities. These authorities naturally want their fair share of taxes from the profits generated by such important value drivers where these are wholly or partly situated in their respective jurisdictions. This also explains the significant focus on intangibles in the OECD’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) work. It should however be noted that this paper was issued shortly before the final BEPS papers were issued by the OECD in October 2015. While nothing fundamental should be changed as a result of the final OECD recommendations, the paper has not been updated for those. The paper focuses significantly on the issues raised by the BEPS project including addressing frameworks for analysing intangibles transactions, the importance of contractual terms and their consistency with actual conduct and functions and of course, the need to allocate intangible profits to those locations where the substantive value creating functions are undertaken. In this respect the so-called “DEMPE” functions are addressed (i.e. Development, Enhancement, Maintenance, Protection and Exploitation) and usefully illustrated by the author with practical real life examples detailing how the intangibles process can be mapped out to identify the truly important functions and risks, the range of values that might be attached to those and where they are carried out or in substance reside. Methodologies for pricing various intangibles transactions are explored in some depth including the availability (or lack thereof) of good third party comparables and the usefulness and limitations of publicly available databases in searching for the same. Comparable Profits methods and Profit Split methodologies are also discussed again noting the practical difficulties associated with applying such methods to unique intangibles. The pricing methods are usefully linked by the author to various methods for valuing intangibles as these should clearly be consistent with the pricing of individual intangible transactions and vice versa. The valuations section covers cost based, market based and income-based approaches to valuations, forecasting issues and discounted cash flow models including the use of Capital Asset Pricing Models (CAPM). The paper also explores some of the difficulties in valuing early stage technologies and goes on to address more sophisticated approaches such as the use of Real Options and Game Theory. A practical section linked to detailed country Appendices addresses how various Asian and Western countries presently approach certain intangible transactions including the sale or purchase of intangibles, licensing of intangibles and cost sharing. The section explains some of the barriers and uncertainty of tax treatment that often exists especially in developing nations. The paper concludes with a brief commentary on so-called Patent Box regimes that have been introduced in a number of countries and discusses the proposed moderation to such regimes in the “Nexus” approach put forward by the OECD. A number of PwC participants from Singapore and around the world helped with certain sections of the paper and provided input for the country responses that were summarised and incorporated into the data provided in Appendices 3 and 4. The author extends his sincere thanks to them. Similarly, thanks were also extended to Daryl Tan Junyang, a student at SMU who contributed research to several sections.
无形资产的税收和定价
这份研究报告是由艾伦·罗斯(Alan Ross)受新加坡税务学院和新加坡管理大学税务卓越中心委托撰写的。在加入新加坡之前,Alan曾担任普华永道新加坡税务主管,并在普华永道海外担任多个领导职务。他在国际税收和转让定价方面拥有超过30年的经验,包括与无形资产税收相关的主要问题。本文首先论述了近年来无形资产对企业价值的巨大贡献。将无形资产的所有权从一个司法管辖区转移到另一个司法管辖区(可能是税率较低的司法管辖区)相对容易,这突显了许多税务机关的担忧。这些当局自然希望从这些全部或部分位于各自管辖范围内的重要价值驱动因素产生的利润中获得公平的税收份额。这也解释了经合组织税基侵蚀和利润转移(BEPS)工作中对无形资产的重要关注。然而,应该指出的是,本文是在经合组织于2015年10月发布BEPS最终文件前不久发布的。虽然经合组织的最终建议不应该改变任何根本的东西,但这份文件并没有针对这些建议进行更新。该文件主要关注BEPS项目提出的问题,包括解决分析无形资产交易的框架,合同条款的重要性及其与实际行为和职能的一致性,当然还有将无形利润分配给承担实质性价值创造职能的地点的必要性。在这方面,作者论述了所谓的“DEMPE”功能(即开发、增强、维护、保护和利用),并通过实际生活中的例子进行了有用的说明,详细说明了如何制定无形过程以识别真正重要的功能和风险,可能附加的价值范围以及它们在哪里执行或在实质上存在。对各种无形资产交易的定价方法进行了一些深入的探讨,包括良好的第三方可比性的可用性(或缺乏)以及搜索相同的公共可用数据库的有用性和局限性。还再次讨论了可比利润方法和利润分割方法,指出了将这些方法应用于独特的无形资产的实际困难。作者将这些定价方法与各种无形资产估值方法有效地联系在一起,因为这些方法显然应该与个别无形交易的定价一致,反之亦然。估值部分涵盖基于成本,基于市场和基于收入的估值方法,预测问题和贴现现金流模型,包括使用资本资产定价模型(CAPM)。本文还探讨了评估早期技术的一些困难,并继续解决更复杂的方法,如使用实物期权和博弈论。与详细的国家附录相连的实用部分介绍了亚洲和西方国家目前如何处理某些无形交易,包括无形资产的出售或购买,无形资产的许可和成本分摊。本节解释了税收待遇的一些障碍和不确定性,特别是在发展中国家。本文最后简要评论了一些国家引入的所谓专利箱制度,并讨论了经合组织提出的“Nexus”方法中对此类制度的建议缓和。来自新加坡和世界各地的普华永道的一些参与者帮助完成了论文的某些部分,并为总结并纳入附录3和4中提供的数据的国家回应提供了输入。作者向他们表示衷心的感谢。同样,我们也要感谢新大学生谭俊阳(Daryl Tan Junyang),他为几个版块贡献了研究成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信