PENGUKURAN KINERJA DAN AKUNTABILITAS ORGANISASI PUBLIK

E. Wargadinata
{"title":"PENGUKURAN KINERJA DAN AKUNTABILITAS ORGANISASI PUBLIK","authors":"E. Wargadinata","doi":"10.34010/miu.v17i1.2226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relation between performance measurement and accountability is already shown empirically and conceptually in literatures and researches. In 1999, The Government of Indonesia implemented performance accountability system as a periodic government institution accountability mechanism to give their responsibility on resources management, policy implementation based on their authority. \nThe research consist four variables, Performance Measurement Mechanism, Instrument Quality, Organization capacity and Organization Accountability. Quantitative method used as research method with regression analysis which conducted at 28 local organizations at Bandung city, covered 161 respondents. This research conducted by conceptual framework of performance measurement by Moran (2013), Instrument quality by Van Dooren et al (2010) , organization capacity from Ingraham (2003) and Accountability concept by Koppel (2005.  Research result shows that organization accountability can be achieved if the performance measurement implemented correctly. Research conclusion is Performance Measurement Mechanism, Instrument Quality and Organization capacity are influence the Organization Accountability. \nThe research recommendation is strengthening performance measurement implementation at local level through knowledge transfer and taking consideration on organization capacity to create compatible perofrmance measurement model based on characteristic organization. \n  \nKey Words: Performance Measurement, Mechanism, Quality, Capacity, Accountability, Public Sector","PeriodicalId":297715,"journal":{"name":"Majalah Ilmiah UNIKOM","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Majalah Ilmiah UNIKOM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34010/miu.v17i1.2226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relation between performance measurement and accountability is already shown empirically and conceptually in literatures and researches. In 1999, The Government of Indonesia implemented performance accountability system as a periodic government institution accountability mechanism to give their responsibility on resources management, policy implementation based on their authority. The research consist four variables, Performance Measurement Mechanism, Instrument Quality, Organization capacity and Organization Accountability. Quantitative method used as research method with regression analysis which conducted at 28 local organizations at Bandung city, covered 161 respondents. This research conducted by conceptual framework of performance measurement by Moran (2013), Instrument quality by Van Dooren et al (2010) , organization capacity from Ingraham (2003) and Accountability concept by Koppel (2005.  Research result shows that organization accountability can be achieved if the performance measurement implemented correctly. Research conclusion is Performance Measurement Mechanism, Instrument Quality and Organization capacity are influence the Organization Accountability. The research recommendation is strengthening performance measurement implementation at local level through knowledge transfer and taking consideration on organization capacity to create compatible perofrmance measurement model based on characteristic organization.   Key Words: Performance Measurement, Mechanism, Quality, Capacity, Accountability, Public Sector
公共机构的绩效衡量和问责制
绩效评估与问责之间的关系已经在文献和研究中得到了实证和概念上的体现。1999年,印度尼西亚政府实施绩效问责制,作为一种定期的政府机构问责机制,赋予其在资源管理、政策执行方面的责任,以其职权为基础。研究包括绩效测量机制、仪器质量、组织能力和组织责任四个变量。采用定量方法作为回归分析的研究方法,对万隆市28个地方组织进行了调查,调查对象为161人。本研究采用了Moran(2013)、Van Dooren等人(2010)、Ingraham(2003)和Koppel(2005)提出的绩效测量概念框架、工具质量(2010)、组织能力(2003)和责任概念(2005)。研究结果表明,正确实施绩效测量可以实现组织问责。研究结论是绩效测量机制、工具质量和组织能力对组织问责制有影响。研究建议通过知识转移加强地方层面的绩效测量实施,并考虑组织能力,建立基于特征组织的兼容的绩效测量模型。关键词:绩效评估,机制,质量,能力,问责制,公共部门
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信