A quantitative method for the assessment of VSC-HVdc controller simulations in EMT tools

Robert Rogersten, L. Vanfretti, Wei Li, Lidong Zhang, P. Mitra
{"title":"A quantitative method for the assessment of VSC-HVdc controller simulations in EMT tools","authors":"Robert Rogersten, L. Vanfretti, Wei Li, Lidong Zhang, P. Mitra","doi":"10.1109/ISGTEUROPE.2014.7028824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Voltage-Source Converter-Based High-voltage dc (VSC-HVdc) technology has received growing interest during recent years due to its benefits for separated active and reactive power control. Before the installation of VSC-HVdc links, different simulation-based studies need to be performed, usually by different parties and using different electromagnetic transient (EMT) simulation platforms. This paper provides a systematic method to assess discrepancies between simulation tools. Models of the VSC and its control systems are implemented from scratch in two different tools. A metric and a methodology to quantitatively assess the discrepancies between simulation results is proposed and illustrated. The paper shows that even with a pedantic re-implementation of the models from the ground up, simulation results are still inconsistent. The objective of this paper is to develop a quantification method for comparing the models developed in different EMT simulation tool and to emphasize differences that can arise with the numerical solvers in such tools.","PeriodicalId":299515,"journal":{"name":"IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies, Europe","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies, Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGTEUROPE.2014.7028824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Voltage-Source Converter-Based High-voltage dc (VSC-HVdc) technology has received growing interest during recent years due to its benefits for separated active and reactive power control. Before the installation of VSC-HVdc links, different simulation-based studies need to be performed, usually by different parties and using different electromagnetic transient (EMT) simulation platforms. This paper provides a systematic method to assess discrepancies between simulation tools. Models of the VSC and its control systems are implemented from scratch in two different tools. A metric and a methodology to quantitatively assess the discrepancies between simulation results is proposed and illustrated. The paper shows that even with a pedantic re-implementation of the models from the ground up, simulation results are still inconsistent. The objective of this paper is to develop a quantification method for comparing the models developed in different EMT simulation tool and to emphasize differences that can arise with the numerical solvers in such tools.
EMT工具中VSC-HVdc控制器仿真的定量评估方法
基于电压源变换器的高压直流(vcs - hvdc)技术由于其分离有功和无功控制的优点,近年来受到越来越多的关注。在安装vcs - hvdc链路之前,需要进行不同的基于仿真的研究,通常由不同的方使用不同的电磁瞬变(EMT)仿真平台。本文提供了一种系统的方法来评估模拟工具之间的差异。VSC及其控制系统的模型在两种不同的工具中从零开始实现。提出并说明了定量评估模拟结果之间差异的度量和方法。本文表明,即使对模型进行了彻底的重新实现,仿真结果仍然不一致。本文的目的是开发一种量化方法来比较不同EMT模拟工具中开发的模型,并强调这些工具中数值解算器可能出现的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信