The Distributional Impact of Recessions: The Global Financial Crisis and the Pandemic Recession

Ippei Shibata
{"title":"The Distributional Impact of Recessions: The Global Financial Crisis and the Pandemic Recession","authors":"Ippei Shibata","doi":"10.5089/9781513546759.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using the U.S. Current Population Survey data, this paper compares the distributional impacts of the Pandemic Crisis and those of the Global Financial Crisis in terms of (i) worker characteristics, (ii) job characteristics–“social” (where individuals interact to consume goods), “teleworkable” (where individuals have the option of working at home), and “essential” jobs (which were not subject to government mandated shut-downs during the recent recession), and (iii) wage distributions. We find that young and less educated workers have always been affected more in recessions, while women and Hispanics were more severely affected during the Pandemic Recession. Surprisingly, teleworkable, social and essential jobs have been historically less cyclical. This historical acyclicality of teleworkable occupations is attributable to its higher share of skilled workers. Unlike during the Global Financial Crisis, however, employment in social industries fell more whereas employment in teleworkable and essential jobs fell less during the Pandemic Crisis. Lastly, during both recessions, workers at low-income earnings have suffered more than top-income earners, suggesting a significant distributional impact of the two recessions.","PeriodicalId":123550,"journal":{"name":"Financial Crises eJournal","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Crises eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513546759.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Using the U.S. Current Population Survey data, this paper compares the distributional impacts of the Pandemic Crisis and those of the Global Financial Crisis in terms of (i) worker characteristics, (ii) job characteristics–“social” (where individuals interact to consume goods), “teleworkable” (where individuals have the option of working at home), and “essential” jobs (which were not subject to government mandated shut-downs during the recent recession), and (iii) wage distributions. We find that young and less educated workers have always been affected more in recessions, while women and Hispanics were more severely affected during the Pandemic Recession. Surprisingly, teleworkable, social and essential jobs have been historically less cyclical. This historical acyclicality of teleworkable occupations is attributable to its higher share of skilled workers. Unlike during the Global Financial Crisis, however, employment in social industries fell more whereas employment in teleworkable and essential jobs fell less during the Pandemic Crisis. Lastly, during both recessions, workers at low-income earnings have suffered more than top-income earners, suggesting a significant distributional impact of the two recessions.
衰退的分配影响:全球金融危机和大范围衰退
本文利用美国当前人口调查数据,从以下方面比较了大流行危机和全球金融危机的分布影响:(i)工人特征,(ii)工作特征——“社交”(个人互动消费商品),“远程工作”(个人可以选择在家工作)和“必要”工作(在最近的经济衰退期间不受政府强制关闭的影响),以及(iii)工资分布。我们发现,年轻和受教育程度较低的工人在经济衰退中受到的影响总是更大,而妇女和西班牙裔在大流行经济衰退期间受到的影响更严重。令人惊讶的是,从历史上看,远程工作、社交工作和必要工作的周期性较低。远程工作的这种历史非周期性可归因于其较高的熟练工人份额。然而,与全球金融危机期间不同的是,在大流行危机期间,社会行业的就业下降幅度更大,而远程工作和基本工作的就业下降幅度较小。最后,在两次经济衰退中,低收入工人比高收入者遭受的损失更大,这表明两次经济衰退对分配产生了重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信