Feudalism in History . Ed. Rushton Coulborn. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1956. xiv, 439. Bibliographies, Index. $8.50.

J. R. Levenson
{"title":"Feudalism in History . Ed. Rushton Coulborn. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1956. xiv, 439. Bibliographies, Index. $8.50.","authors":"J. R. Levenson","doi":"10.2307/2941925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Feudalism in History. Ed. RUSHTON COTJLBOBN. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1956. xiv, 439. Bibliographies, Index. $8.50. This collective volume is something of a boot-strap operation; it begins with a short general essay on the idea of feudalism, continues more or less deductively with special studies of eight histories (including Chinese, Japanese, and Indian) which may have illustrated this idea, and concludes with a long comparative essay re-educing the generalization, and refining it, on the basis of the studies. Among the latter, Derk Bodde's on China, a calm synthesis of views sometimes acrimoniously held, accepts a feudal tag for the Chou period and emphasizes structure and social prerequisites. Edwin 0. Reischauer, for Japan, adds more of the time dimension—in what way and to what culmination does feudalism work itself out? The Indian material seems relatively intractable; Daniel Thorner simply does not have enough straw to make bricks. The aim of the whole is to test for repetition, or uniformities, in history.","PeriodicalId":369319,"journal":{"name":"The Far Eastern Quarterly","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1956-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Far Eastern Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2941925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Feudalism in History. Ed. RUSHTON COTJLBOBN. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1956. xiv, 439. Bibliographies, Index. $8.50. This collective volume is something of a boot-strap operation; it begins with a short general essay on the idea of feudalism, continues more or less deductively with special studies of eight histories (including Chinese, Japanese, and Indian) which may have illustrated this idea, and concludes with a long comparative essay re-educing the generalization, and refining it, on the basis of the studies. Among the latter, Derk Bodde's on China, a calm synthesis of views sometimes acrimoniously held, accepts a feudal tag for the Chou period and emphasizes structure and social prerequisites. Edwin 0. Reischauer, for Japan, adds more of the time dimension—in what way and to what culmination does feudalism work itself out? The Indian material seems relatively intractable; Daniel Thorner simply does not have enough straw to make bricks. The aim of the whole is to test for repetition, or uniformities, in history.
历史上的封建主义。艾德,拉什顿·科尔伯恩。普林斯顿:普林斯顿大学出版社,1956。十四,439年。参考书目、索引。8.50美元。
历史上的封建主义。埃德。拉什顿。普林斯顿:普林斯顿大学出版社,1956。十四,439年。参考书目、索引。8.50美元。这种集合体的体量是一种引导操作;它以一篇简短的关于封建主义思想的一般性文章开始,接着或多或少地对可能阐明这一思想的八种历史(包括中国、日本和印度)进行了特别研究,并以一篇长篇比较文章结束,在这些研究的基础上重新归纳和完善了这一概括。在后者中,德克·博德(Derk Bodde)的《中国论》(on China)冷静地综合了一些有时颇为激烈的观点,接受了周朝的封建标签,强调了结构和社会先决条件。埃德温·0。对日本来说,赖肖尔增加了更多的时间维度——封建主义以何种方式和达到何种高潮?印度的材料似乎相对棘手;丹尼尔·索纳根本没有足够的稻草来做砖。整体的目的是测试历史上的重复或一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信