{"title":"Whitehead in Class: Do the Harvard-Radcliffe Course Notes Change How We Understand Whitehead’s Thought?","authors":"Brian G. Henning","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474461351.003.0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Brian Henning’s chapter takes a close look at numerous key passages that shift our understanding of Whitehead (including, for instance, the influence of C. D. Broad as a philosophical foil), and, just as importantly, notes the subjects and terms missing from this first year of lectures which we might have expected to find, including God and even (mostly) creativity. While there may be no ‘smoking gun’ in the lectures which fundamentally contradicts previous understandings of Whitehead, they deepen our understanding of his philosophical development, not to mention reveal his explicit thoughts on specific philosophers and scientists who are seldom discussed in his published works.","PeriodicalId":324412,"journal":{"name":"Whitehead at Harvard, 1924-1925","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Whitehead at Harvard, 1924-1925","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474461351.003.0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Brian Henning’s chapter takes a close look at numerous key passages that shift our understanding of Whitehead (including, for instance, the influence of C. D. Broad as a philosophical foil), and, just as importantly, notes the subjects and terms missing from this first year of lectures which we might have expected to find, including God and even (mostly) creativity. While there may be no ‘smoking gun’ in the lectures which fundamentally contradicts previous understandings of Whitehead, they deepen our understanding of his philosophical development, not to mention reveal his explicit thoughts on specific philosophers and scientists who are seldom discussed in his published works.
Brian Henning的这一章仔细研究了许多关键段落,这些段落改变了我们对怀特黑德的理解(包括,例如,作为哲学辅助的c.d. Broad的影响),同样重要的是,注意到我们可能期望在第一年的讲座中找到的主题和术语,包括上帝,甚至(大部分)创造力。虽然在讲座中可能没有“确凿的证据”从根本上与之前对怀特黑德的理解相矛盾,但它们加深了我们对他的哲学发展的理解,更不用说揭示了他对特定哲学家和科学家的明确想法,这些想法在他的出版作品中很少被讨论。