Entitlement’s Enablers: Parents and Teachers

K. Anderson
{"title":"Entitlement’s Enablers: Parents and Teachers","authors":"K. Anderson","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780197578438.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores the development of entitlement in individuals. What entities surrounding the newborn, the child, and young adult facilitate the sense of deservingness that some people have relative to others? This chapter begins with the role that parents play in producing a child with a social dominance orientation or authoritarian tendencies: two ideologies that are associated with entitlement. Parents’ ideas about race and gender are also significant in how their child will think about their place in the world. Globally, boys are the preferred gender, and this preference is due to the fact that in most cultures, men have more status and power than do women. Chapter 3 explores the gendered treatment of children by caregivers, beginning with parents’ attitudes toward their newborn daughters and sons. Adult heterosexual men tend to have a sense of domestic entitlement, meaning they feel justified doing less domestic labor than their spouse. This sense of entitlement begins with the toys and then chores parents assign to their daughters and sons. Chapter 3 next examines teachers’ role in facilitating entitlement. Teachers’ expectations and treatment of students unintentionally influences entitlement in boys relative to girls, and in White students relative to students of color. If teachers’ expectations (and biases) can have a measurable impact over the course of one school year, imagine the consequences over a student’s entire academic career. Being the normative racial category allows one to be given the benefit of the doubt when it comes to school discipline. Unlike students of color, for White kids, the school experience allows them to feel entitled to impartial or even preferential treatment by law enforcement and the criminal legal system.","PeriodicalId":188252,"journal":{"name":"Enraged, Rattled, and Wronged","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enraged, Rattled, and Wronged","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780197578438.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter explores the development of entitlement in individuals. What entities surrounding the newborn, the child, and young adult facilitate the sense of deservingness that some people have relative to others? This chapter begins with the role that parents play in producing a child with a social dominance orientation or authoritarian tendencies: two ideologies that are associated with entitlement. Parents’ ideas about race and gender are also significant in how their child will think about their place in the world. Globally, boys are the preferred gender, and this preference is due to the fact that in most cultures, men have more status and power than do women. Chapter 3 explores the gendered treatment of children by caregivers, beginning with parents’ attitudes toward their newborn daughters and sons. Adult heterosexual men tend to have a sense of domestic entitlement, meaning they feel justified doing less domestic labor than their spouse. This sense of entitlement begins with the toys and then chores parents assign to their daughters and sons. Chapter 3 next examines teachers’ role in facilitating entitlement. Teachers’ expectations and treatment of students unintentionally influences entitlement in boys relative to girls, and in White students relative to students of color. If teachers’ expectations (and biases) can have a measurable impact over the course of one school year, imagine the consequences over a student’s entire academic career. Being the normative racial category allows one to be given the benefit of the doubt when it comes to school discipline. Unlike students of color, for White kids, the school experience allows them to feel entitled to impartial or even preferential treatment by law enforcement and the criminal legal system.
权利的推动者:家长和老师
本章探讨个人权利的发展。新生儿、儿童和年轻人周围的什么实体促进了一些人相对于他人的应得感?本章从父母在培养具有社会支配倾向或专制倾向的孩子中所起的作用开始:这两种意识形态与权利有关。父母对种族和性别的看法对孩子如何看待他们在世界上的位置也很重要。在全球范围内,男孩是首选的性别,这种偏好是由于在大多数文化中,男性比女性拥有更多的地位和权力。第三章探讨了照顾者对儿童的性别对待,从父母对新生女儿和儿子的态度开始。成年异性恋男性往往有一种家庭权利感,这意味着他们觉得比配偶做的家务少是合理的。这种权利感始于玩具,然后是父母分配给儿女的家务。第三章接着探讨教师在促进权利方面的作用。教师对学生的期望和对待无意中影响了男孩相对于女孩的权利,以及白人学生相对于有色人种学生的权利。如果教师的期望(和偏见)可以在一个学年的过程中产生可衡量的影响,那么想象一下对学生整个学术生涯的影响。作为一个规范的种族类别,当涉及到学校纪律时,一个人可以被给予怀疑的好处。与有色人种学生不同,对于白人孩子来说,学校的经历让他们觉得自己有权得到执法部门和刑事司法系统的公正甚至优惠待遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信