Big Tech Platforms in Health Research: Re-purposing Big Data Governance in Light of the GDPR’s Research Exemption

L. Marelli, G. Testa, I. van Hoyweghen
{"title":"Big Tech Platforms in Health Research: Re-purposing Big Data Governance in Light of the GDPR’s Research Exemption","authors":"L. Marelli, G. Testa, I. van Hoyweghen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3712168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The emergence of a global industry of digital health platforms operated by Big Tech corporations, and its growing entanglements with academic and pharmaceutical research networks, have raised increasingly pressing questions on the capacity of current data governance models, regulatory and legal frameworks to safeguard the sustainability of the health research ecosystem. In this article, we direct our attention towards the challenges faced by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe to regulate the potentially disruptive engagement of Big Tech platforms in health research. The GDPR ushers in a rather flexible regime for scientific research through a number of exemptions to otherwise stricter data protection requirements, while providing a very broad interpretation of the notion of ‘scientific research’. In fact, we contend, the breadth of these exemptions combined with the ample scope of this notion can open up a ‘regulatory backdoor’ that could provide unintended leeway to a number of privacy-infringing and socially disruptive practices carried out by Big Tech platforms in the health domain. Accordingly, we propose further finer-grained distinctions to be traced within this broadly construed framing of scientific research, geared to the implementation of use-based data governance frameworks that demarcate health research activities to be carried out within a facilitated data protection regime from those to subject to more stringent requirements. On the basis of our analysis, it is our contention that a ‘re-purposing’ of big data governance approaches in health research is needed if European nations are to promote research activities within a framework of high safeguards for both individual citizens and society.","PeriodicalId":326237,"journal":{"name":"BioRN: Bioethics (Topic)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioRN: Bioethics (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3712168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The emergence of a global industry of digital health platforms operated by Big Tech corporations, and its growing entanglements with academic and pharmaceutical research networks, have raised increasingly pressing questions on the capacity of current data governance models, regulatory and legal frameworks to safeguard the sustainability of the health research ecosystem. In this article, we direct our attention towards the challenges faced by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe to regulate the potentially disruptive engagement of Big Tech platforms in health research. The GDPR ushers in a rather flexible regime for scientific research through a number of exemptions to otherwise stricter data protection requirements, while providing a very broad interpretation of the notion of ‘scientific research’. In fact, we contend, the breadth of these exemptions combined with the ample scope of this notion can open up a ‘regulatory backdoor’ that could provide unintended leeway to a number of privacy-infringing and socially disruptive practices carried out by Big Tech platforms in the health domain. Accordingly, we propose further finer-grained distinctions to be traced within this broadly construed framing of scientific research, geared to the implementation of use-based data governance frameworks that demarcate health research activities to be carried out within a facilitated data protection regime from those to subject to more stringent requirements. On the basis of our analysis, it is our contention that a ‘re-purposing’ of big data governance approaches in health research is needed if European nations are to promote research activities within a framework of high safeguards for both individual citizens and society.
健康研究中的大技术平台:根据GDPR的研究豁免重新利用大数据治理
由大型科技公司运营的数字健康平台的全球产业的出现,以及它与学术和制药研究网络的日益纠缠,对当前数据治理模式、监管和法律框架保障健康研究生态系统可持续性的能力提出了越来越紧迫的问题。在本文中,我们将注意力转向欧洲通用数据保护条例(GDPR)所面临的挑战,以规范大型科技平台在健康研究中的潜在破坏性参与。GDPR为科学研究引入了一个相当灵活的制度,通过一些豁免,否则更严格的数据保护要求,同时提供了对“科学研究”概念的非常广泛的解释。事实上,我们认为,这些豁免的广度与这一概念的广泛范围相结合,可能会打开一个“监管后门”,为大型科技平台在健康领域实施的一些侵犯隐私和破坏社会的做法提供意想不到的余地。因此,我们建议在这一广泛解释的科学研究框架内进一步进行更细粒度的区分,以实施基于使用的数据治理框架,将在便利的数据保护制度内开展的卫生研究活动与受更严格要求约束的健康研究活动区分开来。根据我们的分析,我们的论点是,如果欧洲国家要在对公民个人和社会都有高度保障的框架内促进研究活动,就需要在健康研究中“重新定位”大数据治理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信