On the Origin of “Diseconomies”

K. Wilson
{"title":"On the Origin of “Diseconomies”","authors":"K. Wilson","doi":"10.1017/S1042771600001307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to Tlie Oxford English Dictionary (OED) the original antonym for economy is ineconomy and not the popular term diseconomy. Ineconomy, it seems was used at least as early as 1897 (see the entry under ineconomy in OED). Although it is equally acceptable for the prefix dis to be used in front of almost any word (according to OED), some curious questions arise. How did diseconomy become so popular to the extent that •\"diseconomies of scale\" rather than \"ineconomies of scale\" is enshrined in the tomes of economics, and who can claim credit for such an addition to the English Language? Let us concentrate on the origin of \"diseconomies of scale.\"","PeriodicalId":123974,"journal":{"name":"History of Economics Society Bulletin","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Economics Society Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1042771600001307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to Tlie Oxford English Dictionary (OED) the original antonym for economy is ineconomy and not the popular term diseconomy. Ineconomy, it seems was used at least as early as 1897 (see the entry under ineconomy in OED). Although it is equally acceptable for the prefix dis to be used in front of almost any word (according to OED), some curious questions arise. How did diseconomy become so popular to the extent that •"diseconomies of scale" rather than "ineconomies of scale" is enshrined in the tomes of economics, and who can claim credit for such an addition to the English Language? Let us concentrate on the origin of "diseconomies of scale."
论“不经济”的根源
根据《牛津英语词典》(OED),“economy”的原意是“ineconomy”,而不是现在流行的“diseconomy”。在经济方面,这个词似乎至少早在1897年就被使用了(参见《牛津英语词典》中的Ineconomy词条)。尽管根据《牛津英语词典》,dis这个前缀几乎可以用在任何单词的前面,但还是出现了一些奇怪的问题。不经济(diseconomy)是如何变得如此流行,以至于“规模不经济”(diseconomies of scale)而不是“规模不经济”(ineconomies of scale)被奉为经济学巨著的?谁又能为英语语言增添这样的内容而感到自豪呢?让我们把注意力集中在“规模不经济”的起源上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信