Homeostatic epistemology : reliability, coherence and coordination in a Bayesian virtue epistemology

S. Devitt
{"title":"Homeostatic epistemology : reliability, coherence and coordination in a Bayesian virtue epistemology","authors":"S. Devitt","doi":"10.7282/T39P2ZP3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How do agents with limited cognitive capacities flourish in informationally impoverished or unexpected circumstances? Aristotle argued that human flourishing emerged from knowing about the world and our place within it. If he is right, then the virtuous processes that produce knowledge, best explain flourishing. Influenced by Aristotle, virtue epistemology defends an analysis of knowledge where beliefs are evaluated for their truth and the intellectual virtue or competences relied on in their creation. However, human flourishing may emerge from how degrees of ignorance are managed in an uncertain world. Perhaps decision-making in the shadow of knowledge best explains human wellbeing—a Bayesian approach? In this dissertation I argue that a hybrid of virtue and Bayesian epistemologies explains human flourishing—what I term homeostatic epistemology. \n \nHomeostatic epistemology supposes that an agent has a rational credence p when p is the product of reliable processes aligned with the norms of probability theory; whereas an agent knows that p when a rational credence p is the product of reliable processes such that: 1) p meets some relevant threshold for belief (such that the agent acts as though p were true and indeed p is true), 2) p coheres with a satisficing set of relevant beliefs and, 3) the relevant set of beliefs is coordinated appropriately to meet the integrated aims of the agent. \n \nHomeostatic epistemology recognizes that justificatory relationships between beliefs are constantly changing to combat uncertainties and to take advantage of predictable circumstances. Contrary to holism, justification is built up and broken down across limited sets like the anabolic and catabolic processes that maintain homeostasis in the cells, organs and systems of the body. It is the coordination of choristic sets of reliably produced beliefs that create the greatest flourishing given the limitations inherent in the situated agent.","PeriodicalId":205147,"journal":{"name":"Division of Technology, Information and Library Services","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Division of Technology, Information and Library Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7282/T39P2ZP3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

How do agents with limited cognitive capacities flourish in informationally impoverished or unexpected circumstances? Aristotle argued that human flourishing emerged from knowing about the world and our place within it. If he is right, then the virtuous processes that produce knowledge, best explain flourishing. Influenced by Aristotle, virtue epistemology defends an analysis of knowledge where beliefs are evaluated for their truth and the intellectual virtue or competences relied on in their creation. However, human flourishing may emerge from how degrees of ignorance are managed in an uncertain world. Perhaps decision-making in the shadow of knowledge best explains human wellbeing—a Bayesian approach? In this dissertation I argue that a hybrid of virtue and Bayesian epistemologies explains human flourishing—what I term homeostatic epistemology. Homeostatic epistemology supposes that an agent has a rational credence p when p is the product of reliable processes aligned with the norms of probability theory; whereas an agent knows that p when a rational credence p is the product of reliable processes such that: 1) p meets some relevant threshold for belief (such that the agent acts as though p were true and indeed p is true), 2) p coheres with a satisficing set of relevant beliefs and, 3) the relevant set of beliefs is coordinated appropriately to meet the integrated aims of the agent. Homeostatic epistemology recognizes that justificatory relationships between beliefs are constantly changing to combat uncertainties and to take advantage of predictable circumstances. Contrary to holism, justification is built up and broken down across limited sets like the anabolic and catabolic processes that maintain homeostasis in the cells, organs and systems of the body. It is the coordination of choristic sets of reliably produced beliefs that create the greatest flourishing given the limitations inherent in the situated agent.
稳态认识论:贝叶斯美德认识论中的可靠性、连贯性和协调性
认知能力有限的个体如何在信息贫乏或意外的情况下蓬勃发展?亚里士多德认为,人类的繁荣源于对世界的了解以及我们在其中的位置。如果他是对的,那么产生知识的良性过程就是繁荣的最好解释。受亚里士多德的影响,美德认识论捍卫了一种对知识的分析,在这种分析中,信仰被评估为真理,以及在创造过程中所依赖的智力美德或能力。然而,人类的繁荣可能取决于在一个不确定的世界中如何管理无知的程度。也许在知识阴影下的决策最好地解释了人类的幸福——一种贝叶斯方法?在这篇论文中,我认为美德和贝叶斯认识论的混合解释了人类的繁荣——我称之为稳态认识论。稳态认识论假设,当p是符合概率论规范的可靠过程的产物时,主体具有理性信任p;然而,当理性信念p是可靠过程的产物时,行为人知道p满足以下条件:1)p满足信念的相关阈值(行为人的行为就好像p为真,p也确实为真)2)p符合一组令人满意的相关信念3)相关信念被适当地协调以满足行为人的综合目标。稳态认识论认识到,信念之间的正当关系不断变化,以对抗不确定性,并利用可预测的环境。与整体论相反,正当性是在有限的集合中建立和分解的,比如维持细胞、器官和身体系统内稳态的合成代谢和分解代谢过程。考虑到所处主体固有的局限性,正是一系列可靠产生的信念的协调创造了最大的繁荣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信