Perfect Politicians? Voting Preferences in the United Kingdom

James Weinberg
{"title":"Perfect Politicians? Voting Preferences in the United Kingdom","authors":"James Weinberg","doi":"10.46692/9781529209174.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 6 extrapolates to macro-level issues of representation and anti-politics to ask: do voters actually get the ‘wrong’ politicians’? The central argument in this chapter reduces to the existence of an unhealthy premium on the individual in contemporary democratic politics, both in terms of the ways representatives understand and execute their professional function and how/why voters become disillusioned regardless of their political choices. These assumptions are tested with an original conjoint experiment conducted with a representative sample of 1637 British citizens. The results show that personality outweighs other political and socio-economic variables as a voting heuristic in experimental scenarios. Compared with data from 168 MPs, these results also indicate that at the aggregate level there is less of a disjuncture than assumed between the personalities the public want in national politics and the personalities they get.","PeriodicalId":297629,"journal":{"name":"Who Enters Politics and Why?","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Who Enters Politics and Why?","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529209174.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chapter 6 extrapolates to macro-level issues of representation and anti-politics to ask: do voters actually get the ‘wrong’ politicians’? The central argument in this chapter reduces to the existence of an unhealthy premium on the individual in contemporary democratic politics, both in terms of the ways representatives understand and execute their professional function and how/why voters become disillusioned regardless of their political choices. These assumptions are tested with an original conjoint experiment conducted with a representative sample of 1637 British citizens. The results show that personality outweighs other political and socio-economic variables as a voting heuristic in experimental scenarios. Compared with data from 168 MPs, these results also indicate that at the aggregate level there is less of a disjuncture than assumed between the personalities the public want in national politics and the personalities they get.
完美的政治家吗?英国的投票偏好
第6章从宏观层面的代表性和反政治问题进行外推,并提出问题:选民是否真的选择了“错误的”政治家?本章的中心论点归结为,在当代民主政治中,存在一种对个人的不健康的溢价,这既体现在代表理解和执行其专业职能的方式上,也体现在选民如何/为什么不管他们的政治选择如何,都会失望。这些假设是通过对1637名英国公民的代表性样本进行的原始联合实验来验证的。结果表明,在实验场景中,人格因素比其他政治和社会经济变量更重要。与168名国会议员的数据相比,这些结果还表明,在总体水平上,公众希望在国家政治中获得的个性与他们得到的个性之间的脱节比想象的要小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信