Understanding Instructor Immediacy, Credibility, and Facework Strategies Through a Qualitative Analysis of Written Instructor Feedback

Elizabeth E. Gardner, L. Anderson, A. Wolvin
{"title":"Understanding Instructor Immediacy, Credibility, and Facework Strategies Through a Qualitative Analysis of Written Instructor Feedback","authors":"Elizabeth E. Gardner, L. Anderson, A. Wolvin","doi":"10.1080/17459435.2016.1247113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Written feedback is an important but often overlooked aspect of an instructor’s training and responsibilities, even though it is central to student learning. We analyzed 3,071 written instructor comments on a single assignment from 95 sections to understand how immediacy, credibility, and facework are reflected in written feedback. In taking a heuristic approach to data analysis, we found two overarching themes: fostering goodwill and using context-specific feedback. These overlapping themes demonstrated various strategies of instructor immediacy, credibility, and facework that negotiated the instructor–student relationship in conjunction with course content and policies. Examining these themes allowed us to identify strengths and weaknesses in methods of instructor feedback that would not have been visible using traditional quantitative methods of assessment and have practical implications for the administration of our course.","PeriodicalId":406864,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research Reports in Communication","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research Reports in Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17459435.2016.1247113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Written feedback is an important but often overlooked aspect of an instructor’s training and responsibilities, even though it is central to student learning. We analyzed 3,071 written instructor comments on a single assignment from 95 sections to understand how immediacy, credibility, and facework are reflected in written feedback. In taking a heuristic approach to data analysis, we found two overarching themes: fostering goodwill and using context-specific feedback. These overlapping themes demonstrated various strategies of instructor immediacy, credibility, and facework that negotiated the instructor–student relationship in conjunction with course content and policies. Examining these themes allowed us to identify strengths and weaknesses in methods of instructor feedback that would not have been visible using traditional quantitative methods of assessment and have practical implications for the administration of our course.
通过对教师书面反馈的定性分析,了解教师的即时性、可信度和面子策略
尽管书面反馈对学生的学习至关重要,但在教师的培训和职责中却经常被忽视。我们分析了来自95个部分的3071份教师书面评论,以了解书面反馈是如何反映即时性、可信度和表面性的。在采用启发式方法进行数据分析时,我们发现了两个主要主题:培养善意和使用具体情况的反馈。这些重叠的主题展示了教师即时性、可信度和面部表情的各种策略,这些策略结合课程内容和政策来协商教师与学生的关系。考察这些主题使我们能够确定教师反馈方法的优点和缺点,这些优点和缺点使用传统的定量评估方法是看不到的,并且对我们的课程管理具有实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信