Suppression of Oscillation of a Certain Two-Mass System with the Help of the Generalized Gauss Principle

Kamilla Maratovna Fazlyeva, T. Shugailo, M. Yushkov
{"title":"Suppression of Oscillation of a Certain Two-Mass System with the Help of the Generalized Gauss Principle","authors":"Kamilla Maratovna Fazlyeva, T. Shugailo, M. Yushkov","doi":"10.11648/j.ijmea.20170503.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper studies the suppression of oscillation of a certain two-mass system when it is transferred from the initial state of rest to the given state of rest during a time interval prescribed. The problem is solved by the two methods: the Pontryagin maximum principle (first method) and the generalized Gauss principle (second method). Computational results are presented and the solutions are compared to each other. When the time of motion is short the both methods give practically the same results, but when the time of motion is long the results differ widely. If the time of motion is long then the second method is more preferable than the first one, since the control obtained by the second method sways the mechanical system less than the control obtained by the classical approach. This can be explained by the fact that the first method contains the control including harmonics with the natural frequency of the system, and this seeks to put the system into resonance. In contrast to this, in the second method the control is sought in the form of time polynomial that provides relatively smooth motion of the system. It is noted that the first method always finds the control with jumps at the beginning and at the end of motion. The second method also gives the same jumps when the time of motion is short, but when the time of motion is long the similar jumps vanish when one uses the generalized Gauss principle.","PeriodicalId":398842,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmea.20170503.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper studies the suppression of oscillation of a certain two-mass system when it is transferred from the initial state of rest to the given state of rest during a time interval prescribed. The problem is solved by the two methods: the Pontryagin maximum principle (first method) and the generalized Gauss principle (second method). Computational results are presented and the solutions are compared to each other. When the time of motion is short the both methods give practically the same results, but when the time of motion is long the results differ widely. If the time of motion is long then the second method is more preferable than the first one, since the control obtained by the second method sways the mechanical system less than the control obtained by the classical approach. This can be explained by the fact that the first method contains the control including harmonics with the natural frequency of the system, and this seeks to put the system into resonance. In contrast to this, in the second method the control is sought in the form of time polynomial that provides relatively smooth motion of the system. It is noted that the first method always finds the control with jumps at the beginning and at the end of motion. The second method also gives the same jumps when the time of motion is short, but when the time of motion is long the similar jumps vanish when one uses the generalized Gauss principle.
用广义高斯原理抑制某双质量系统的振荡
本文研究了某双质量系统在规定的时间间隔内由初始静止状态过渡到给定静止状态时的振动抑制问题。用庞特里亚金极大值原理(第一种方法)和广义高斯原理(第二种方法)两种方法来解决这个问题。给出了计算结果,并对求解结果进行了比较。当运动时间较短时,两种方法得到的结果几乎相同,但当运动时间较长时,结果差别很大。如果运动时间较长,则第二种方法比第一种方法更可取,因为第二种方法获得的控制比经典方法获得的控制对机械系统的影响更小。这可以用以下事实来解释:第一种方法包含了控制,包括系统固有频率的谐波,这是为了使系统进入共振。与此相反,在第二种方法中,以时间多项式的形式寻求控制,以提供系统相对平滑的运动。值得注意的是,第一种方法总是在运动的开始和结束时找到带有跳跃的控制。第二种方法在运动时间较短时也有相同的跳跃,但当运动时间较长时,使用广义高斯原理时类似的跳跃就消失了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信