Algorithmic Decision-making in the US Healthcare Industry

Marco Marabelli, S. Newell, Xinru Page
{"title":"Algorithmic Decision-making in the US Healthcare Industry","authors":"Marco Marabelli, S. Newell, Xinru Page","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3262379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this research in progress we present the initial stage of a large ethnographic study at a healthcare network in the US. Our goal is to understand how healthcare organizations in the US use algorithms to improve efficiency (cost saving) and effectiveness (quality) of healthcare. Our preliminary findings illustrate that at the national level, algorithms might be detrimental to healthcare quality because they do not consider (and differentiate) contextual issues such as social and cultural (local) settings. At the practice (hospital/physician) level, they help managing the tradeoff between following national “best practices” and accommodating needs of special patients or particular situations, because hospital-based algorithms can be over-ridden by clinicians. We conclude that, while more data needs to be collected, a responsible use of algorithms requires their constant supervision and their application with respect to specific social and cultural settings.","PeriodicalId":254950,"journal":{"name":"DecisionSciRN: Algorithmic Decision-Making (Sub-Topic)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DecisionSciRN: Algorithmic Decision-Making (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3262379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In this research in progress we present the initial stage of a large ethnographic study at a healthcare network in the US. Our goal is to understand how healthcare organizations in the US use algorithms to improve efficiency (cost saving) and effectiveness (quality) of healthcare. Our preliminary findings illustrate that at the national level, algorithms might be detrimental to healthcare quality because they do not consider (and differentiate) contextual issues such as social and cultural (local) settings. At the practice (hospital/physician) level, they help managing the tradeoff between following national “best practices” and accommodating needs of special patients or particular situations, because hospital-based algorithms can be over-ridden by clinicians. We conclude that, while more data needs to be collected, a responsible use of algorithms requires their constant supervision and their application with respect to specific social and cultural settings.
美国医疗保健行业的算法决策
在这项正在进行的研究中,我们提出了在美国医疗保健网络进行的大型人种学研究的初始阶段。我们的目标是了解美国的医疗保健组织如何使用算法来提高医疗保健的效率(节约成本)和有效性(质量)。我们的初步研究结果表明,在国家层面上,算法可能不利于医疗保健质量,因为它们没有考虑(并区分)诸如社会和文化(当地)环境等背景问题。在实践(医院/医生)层面,它们有助于在遵循国家“最佳实践”和适应特殊患者或特殊情况的需求之间进行权衡,因为基于医院的算法可能被临床医生推翻。我们的结论是,虽然需要收集更多的数据,但对算法的负责任使用需要对其进行持续监督,并根据特定的社会和文化环境对其进行应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信