ANALISIS SIFAT MEKANIK PIPA CARBON STEEL GRADE A A106 DAN GRADE B A53 UNTUK PROSES PRODUKSI PADA KILANG LNG

Bina Teknika Pub Date : 2018-12-17 DOI:10.54378/bt.v14i2.335
Media Nofri, Arif Fardiansyah
{"title":"ANALISIS SIFAT MEKANIK PIPA CARBON STEEL GRADE A A106 DAN GRADE B A53 UNTUK PROSES PRODUKSI PADA KILANG LNG","authors":"Media Nofri, Arif Fardiansyah","doi":"10.54378/bt.v14i2.335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the quality and mechanical properties of carbon steel pipes for the production process at a good liquefied Liquified Natural Gas and after 10 years of use. As a temporary repair reference on damaged pipe. The step is to compare the results of testing the mechanical properties and microstructure of both types of pipes. The parameters used are chemical composition, hardness, tensile strength, and micro structure of both types of pipes. Test results on a good pipe have an average hardness value of 90 HV whereas in the damaged pipe the average hardness value of 85.9 HV decreased by 4.1 HV. The tensile test on a good pipe value of 60kg / mm2 (588 MPa), on a damaged tube of tensile strength of 56 kg / mm2 (549 MPa), decreased 4 kg / mm2 (39 MPa). Good pipe microstructure test results consist of ferrite and pearlite structures while in the damaged pipe consisting of pearlite phase. From the results of the study concluded that the pipeline after the use for 10 years experienced a decrease in mechanical properties, namely: hardness and tensile strength. This is the result of thinning of the corrosion pipe wall thickness.","PeriodicalId":441070,"journal":{"name":"Bina Teknika","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bina Teknika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54378/bt.v14i2.335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to determine the quality and mechanical properties of carbon steel pipes for the production process at a good liquefied Liquified Natural Gas and after 10 years of use. As a temporary repair reference on damaged pipe. The step is to compare the results of testing the mechanical properties and microstructure of both types of pipes. The parameters used are chemical composition, hardness, tensile strength, and micro structure of both types of pipes. Test results on a good pipe have an average hardness value of 90 HV whereas in the damaged pipe the average hardness value of 85.9 HV decreased by 4.1 HV. The tensile test on a good pipe value of 60kg / mm2 (588 MPa), on a damaged tube of tensile strength of 56 kg / mm2 (549 MPa), decreased 4 kg / mm2 (39 MPa). Good pipe microstructure test results consist of ferrite and pearlite structures while in the damaged pipe consisting of pearlite phase. From the results of the study concluded that the pipeline after the use for 10 years experienced a decrease in mechanical properties, namely: hardness and tensile strength. This is the result of thinning of the corrosion pipe wall thickness.
本研究旨在确定在液化天然气良好液化和使用10年后的生产过程中碳钢管的质量和力学性能。作为损坏管道的临时修复参考。步骤是比较两种管道的力学性能和微观结构的测试结果。使用的参数是两种管道的化学成分、硬度、抗拉强度和显微组织。良好管道的平均硬度值为90 HV,而损坏管道的平均硬度值为85.9 HV,下降了4.1 HV。在拉伸试验中,良好管材上的拉伸强度值为60kg / mm2 (588 MPa),在破损管材上的拉伸强度为56 kg / mm2 (549 MPa),降低了4 kg / mm2 (39 MPa)。良好的管道组织测试结果由铁素体和珠光体组织组成,而损坏的管道则由珠光体相组成。从研究结果中得出,管道在使用10年后出现了力学性能的下降,即:硬度和抗拉强度。这是腐蚀管壁厚度变薄的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信