QUANTIFICATION OF DEMAND-SIDE FLEXIBILITY FOR A SMART ACTIVE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING

V. Stepaniuk, J. Pillai, B. Bak‐Jensen
{"title":"QUANTIFICATION OF DEMAND-SIDE FLEXIBILITY FOR A SMART ACTIVE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING","authors":"V. Stepaniuk, J. Pillai, B. Bak‐Jensen","doi":"10.1049/icp.2021.1376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to EU's energy efficiency and climatic change prevention strategy, one of the largest accents in smartening the grid for high penetration of distributed and intermittent renewable energy sources (RESs) is now being made on buildings. Buildings are the largest end-use sector taking about 40% of total final energy consumption and 55% of electricity consumption in the EU-28 in 2012. It is considered as one of the most prospective platforms when utilised smartly to solve discrepancies from mismatch between intermittent energy generation and demand. Referring to the energy performance of Buildings Directive, the flexibility of a building's overall electricity demand, including its ability to enable participation in demand response (DR) is highlighted as one of three main smart grid readiness indicators and key functionalities of buildings. However, flexibility is easy to define but not easy to quantify. This paper aims to quantify the flexibility, namely the actual amount of peak-hour energy that can be shaved through DR application in active residential building equipped with a heat pump (HP) and hot water storage tank (HWST). The advantage of this study is a detailed HP energy model including restarting delay, energy conversion delay, defrost mode, guaranteed power-on duration, aimed to maximally reflect its operating behaviour. The computation of flexibility is realized using a rule-based management strategy to provide a response to a technical (incentive-based and reliability-oriented) DR signal without violating user thermal comfort preferences when following all the aforementioned limitations. Two different storage sizes and two different operational scenarios “with” and “without” DR application are compared.","PeriodicalId":223615,"journal":{"name":"The 9th Renewable Power Generation Conference (RPG Dublin Online 2021)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The 9th Renewable Power Generation Conference (RPG Dublin Online 2021)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2021.1376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to EU's energy efficiency and climatic change prevention strategy, one of the largest accents in smartening the grid for high penetration of distributed and intermittent renewable energy sources (RESs) is now being made on buildings. Buildings are the largest end-use sector taking about 40% of total final energy consumption and 55% of electricity consumption in the EU-28 in 2012. It is considered as one of the most prospective platforms when utilised smartly to solve discrepancies from mismatch between intermittent energy generation and demand. Referring to the energy performance of Buildings Directive, the flexibility of a building's overall electricity demand, including its ability to enable participation in demand response (DR) is highlighted as one of three main smart grid readiness indicators and key functionalities of buildings. However, flexibility is easy to define but not easy to quantify. This paper aims to quantify the flexibility, namely the actual amount of peak-hour energy that can be shaved through DR application in active residential building equipped with a heat pump (HP) and hot water storage tank (HWST). The advantage of this study is a detailed HP energy model including restarting delay, energy conversion delay, defrost mode, guaranteed power-on duration, aimed to maximally reflect its operating behaviour. The computation of flexibility is realized using a rule-based management strategy to provide a response to a technical (incentive-based and reliability-oriented) DR signal without violating user thermal comfort preferences when following all the aforementioned limitations. Two different storage sizes and two different operational scenarios “with” and “without” DR application are compared.
智能主动式住宅建筑需求侧灵活性的量化
根据欧盟的能源效率和气候变化预防战略,智能电网的最大重点之一是分布式和间歇性可再生能源(RESs)的高渗透,现在正在建筑物上进行。建筑是最大的终端使用部门,2012年占欧盟28国最终能源消耗总量的40%和电力消耗的55%。它被认为是最有前途的平台之一,如果巧妙地利用它来解决间歇性能源发电和需求之间不匹配的差异。参考建筑物指令的能源性能,建筑物整体电力需求的灵活性,包括其参与需求响应(DR)的能力,被强调为三个主要智能电网准备指标之一和建筑物的关键功能。然而,灵活性很容易定义,但不容易量化。本文旨在量化灵活性,即在配备热泵(HP)和热水储罐(HWST)的主动式住宅建筑中,通过DR应用可以削减的高峰时段能源的实际量。本研究的优势在于建立了详细的HP能量模型,包括重启延迟、能量转换延迟、除霜模式、保证上电持续时间,旨在最大限度地反映其运行行为。灵活性的计算使用基于规则的管理策略来实现,以提供对技术(基于激励和以可靠性为导向)DR信号的响应,同时在遵循上述所有限制的情况下不违反用户热舒适偏好。对比了两种不同的存储容量和两种不同的容灾操作场景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信