DASHI NAMDAKOV. TRANSFORMATION. WHAT DID THE AUTHOR WANT TO SAY?

A. Kistova
{"title":"DASHI NAMDAKOV. TRANSFORMATION. WHAT DID THE AUTHOR WANT TO SAY?","authors":"A. Kistova","doi":"10.31804/2782-4926-2022-1-1-53-72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article considers the peculiarities of the viewer's perception of a work of fine art with two different approaches to its content. The first approach is based on the viewer's desire to get an answer to the question: «What did the author want to say?». The second approach keeps the focus of the viewer's communication with the work of art on the question: «What is this work about?». In the first case, the artistic idea of the work is comprehended on a personal level, based on the individual author's interpretation of the image. In the second case, a richer assimilation by the viewer of the artistic idea of the work is possible at the personal, actual-historical and universal levels. The specificity of each approach is considered on the example of the sculptural work \"Transformation\" by Dashi Namdakov, located on the campus of the Siberian Federal University (Krasnoyarsk). Based on the methodology of the modern theory of fine arts by V.I. Zhukovsky and N.P. Koptseva convincingly proves that both approaches require significant efforts from the viewer to prepare for interaction with a work of fine art. Otherwise, the content of the work will be reduced to the viewer's fantasies about the author and his life or about the theme of the work. Only conscious viewing, perceived as a skill that needs to be specially trained and constantly trained, can guarantee a deep meaningful interaction of the viewer with a work of fine art at its different content levels.","PeriodicalId":129824,"journal":{"name":"Siberian Art History Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Siberian Art History Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31804/2782-4926-2022-1-1-53-72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article considers the peculiarities of the viewer's perception of a work of fine art with two different approaches to its content. The first approach is based on the viewer's desire to get an answer to the question: «What did the author want to say?». The second approach keeps the focus of the viewer's communication with the work of art on the question: «What is this work about?». In the first case, the artistic idea of the work is comprehended on a personal level, based on the individual author's interpretation of the image. In the second case, a richer assimilation by the viewer of the artistic idea of the work is possible at the personal, actual-historical and universal levels. The specificity of each approach is considered on the example of the sculptural work "Transformation" by Dashi Namdakov, located on the campus of the Siberian Federal University (Krasnoyarsk). Based on the methodology of the modern theory of fine arts by V.I. Zhukovsky and N.P. Koptseva convincingly proves that both approaches require significant efforts from the viewer to prepare for interaction with a work of fine art. Otherwise, the content of the work will be reduced to the viewer's fantasies about the author and his life or about the theme of the work. Only conscious viewing, perceived as a skill that needs to be specially trained and constantly trained, can guarantee a deep meaningful interaction of the viewer with a work of fine art at its different content levels.
鱼汤NAMDAKOV。转换。作者想说什么?
本文考虑了观众对美术作品的感知的特殊性,采用了两种不同的方法来处理其内容。第一种方法是基于观众想要得到这个问题的答案的愿望:“作者想说什么?”第二种方法将观众与艺术作品的交流的焦点放在:“这件作品是关于什么的?”在第一种情况下,作品的艺术理念是在个人层面上理解的,基于作者个人对图像的解释。在第二种情况下,观众在个人、实际历史和普遍层面上更丰富地吸收作品的艺术理念是可能的。每种方法的特殊性都以Dashi Namdakov的雕塑作品“Transformation”为例,该作品位于西伯利亚联邦大学(克拉斯诺亚尔斯克)的校园内。基于V.I.茹科夫斯基和N.P. Koptseva的现代美术理论方法论,令人信服地证明了这两种方法都需要观众付出巨大的努力来准备与美术作品的互动。否则,作品的内容将沦为观众对作者及其生活的幻想或对作品主题的幻想。只有有意识的观看,被认为是一种需要专门训练和不断训练的技能,才能保证观众与不同内容层次的美术作品产生深刻而有意义的互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信