A Platform for Argumentative Zoning Annotation and Scientific Summarization

Alaa El-Ebshihy, Annisa Maulida Ningtyas, Linda Andersson, Florina Piroi, A. Rauber
{"title":"A Platform for Argumentative Zoning Annotation and Scientific Summarization","authors":"Alaa El-Ebshihy, Annisa Maulida Ningtyas, Linda Andersson, Florina Piroi, A. Rauber","doi":"10.1145/3511808.3557193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Argumentative Zoning (AZ) is a tool to obtain informative summaries of scientific articles. Using AZ assumes the definition of the main rhetorical structure in scientific articles, which are, then, used for the summary creation. The unavailability of large AZ annotated benchmark datasets is a bottleneck to training AZ-based summarization algorithms. In this work, we present an annotation platform for an AZ that defines four categories (zones), Claim, Method, Result and Conclusion, that are used to label sentences selected from scientific articles. The proposed tool can be used both for collecting benchmark datasets, and to help the researchers to create their own sub-corpora.","PeriodicalId":389624,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3511808.3557193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Argumentative Zoning (AZ) is a tool to obtain informative summaries of scientific articles. Using AZ assumes the definition of the main rhetorical structure in scientific articles, which are, then, used for the summary creation. The unavailability of large AZ annotated benchmark datasets is a bottleneck to training AZ-based summarization algorithms. In this work, we present an annotation platform for an AZ that defines four categories (zones), Claim, Method, Result and Conclusion, that are used to label sentences selected from scientific articles. The proposed tool can be used both for collecting benchmark datasets, and to help the researchers to create their own sub-corpora.
论证性区划标注与科学总结平台
论证分区(AZ)是一个工具,以获得科学文章的信息摘要。使用AZ假设了科学文章中主要修辞结构的定义,然后用于总结创作。大型可用分区标注基准数据集的不可用性是训练基于可用分区的摘要算法的瓶颈。在这项工作中,我们为AZ提供了一个注释平台,该平台定义了四个类别(区域):声明、方法、结果和结论,用于标记从科学文章中选择的句子。提出的工具既可以用于收集基准数据集,也可以帮助研究人员创建自己的子语料库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信