Visions of a City for All

L. Müller, Stina Ericsson, P. Hedvall
{"title":"Visions of a City for All","authors":"L. Müller, Stina Ericsson, P. Hedvall","doi":"10.32891/jps.v7i2.1486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite laws, policies, and visions to create cities and societies for all, barriers still exclude persons with disabilities from using buildings and public places. Our study aimed to identify choices made during the urban development process, which include or exclude users in the built environment; how and when these arise during the process; and what is needed to implement Universal Design (UD) as a strategy and tool to secure all users equal opportunities in the built environment.The study involved employees and private actors in city development processes. The participants were asked to identify impediments and support of UD in completed building projects to shed light on choices made during the process and on conditions needed to implement UD along the process. Four workshops were followed by qualitative interviews with key players. The analysis was based on qualitative data from workshops and interviews.Aspects impeding and supporting UD and conflicting visions and goals were identified in all phases, and the need for tools to implement UD. Findings show that accessibility for all users is dealt with (too) late in the process, often causing special solutions. Urban trends like densification and high exploitation can cause exclusion of some users, and an unbalanced view on sustainable development prioritising ecological aspects put high demands on users’ abilities. Findings also show how UD appeared more clearly in remodelling projects than in the new constructions. A strong vision from the start to build for all users clearly supported UD throughout the process. Other factors such as pre-studies which include human diversity, allocation of resources and experts’ early opinions also showed to be clear drivers for UD.Overall, the findings show a demand for solutions to maintain early visions and goals throughout the processes. We conclude by providing seven recommendations for addressing these challenges. \n  \nRead the full article in accessible html-format here.","PeriodicalId":407771,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Public Space","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Public Space","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32891/jps.v7i2.1486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite laws, policies, and visions to create cities and societies for all, barriers still exclude persons with disabilities from using buildings and public places. Our study aimed to identify choices made during the urban development process, which include or exclude users in the built environment; how and when these arise during the process; and what is needed to implement Universal Design (UD) as a strategy and tool to secure all users equal opportunities in the built environment.The study involved employees and private actors in city development processes. The participants were asked to identify impediments and support of UD in completed building projects to shed light on choices made during the process and on conditions needed to implement UD along the process. Four workshops were followed by qualitative interviews with key players. The analysis was based on qualitative data from workshops and interviews.Aspects impeding and supporting UD and conflicting visions and goals were identified in all phases, and the need for tools to implement UD. Findings show that accessibility for all users is dealt with (too) late in the process, often causing special solutions. Urban trends like densification and high exploitation can cause exclusion of some users, and an unbalanced view on sustainable development prioritising ecological aspects put high demands on users’ abilities. Findings also show how UD appeared more clearly in remodelling projects than in the new constructions. A strong vision from the start to build for all users clearly supported UD throughout the process. Other factors such as pre-studies which include human diversity, allocation of resources and experts’ early opinions also showed to be clear drivers for UD.Overall, the findings show a demand for solutions to maintain early visions and goals throughout the processes. We conclude by providing seven recommendations for addressing these challenges.   Read the full article in accessible html-format here.
人人共享城市的愿景
尽管有建立人人共享的城市和社会的法律、政策和愿景,但障碍仍然使残疾人无法使用建筑物和公共场所。我们的研究旨在确定在城市发展过程中做出的选择,包括或排除建筑环境中的用户;在这个过程中,这些是如何以及何时出现的;以及如何将通用设计作为一种策略和工具来实施,以确保所有用户在建筑环境中享有平等的机会。这项研究涉及城市发展过程中的雇员和私人行为者。参加者被要求指出在已完成的建筑工程项目中,对发展中项目的阻碍和支持,以说明在这个过程中所作出的选择,以及在这个过程中实施发展中项目所需要的条件。在四个讲习班之后,对主要参与者进行了定性访谈。分析基于研讨会和访谈的定性数据。在所有阶段中都确定了阻碍和支持UD的方面,以及相互冲突的远景和目标,并且需要工具来实现UD。研究结果表明,所有用户的可访问性在处理过程中(太)晚了,通常会产生特殊的解决方案。高密度化和高度开发等城市趋势可能导致部分用户被排斥,而优先考虑生态方面的可持续发展观对用户的能力提出了很高的要求。研究结果还表明,在改造项目中,UD比在新建项目中更为明显。从一开始就为所有用户构建一个强大的愿景,在整个过程中明确支持UD。其他因素,如包括人类多样性、资源分配和专家早期意见在内的预研究,也显示出是UD的明确驱动因素。总的来说,调查结果表明需要在整个过程中保持早期愿景和目标的解决方案。最后,我们为应对这些挑战提供了七条建议。在这里以可访问的html格式阅读全文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信