Human-wildlife conflict: The case of Arjo Dhidhessa sugar factory and its surrounding, Western Ethiopia

Girma Gizachew, Gutema Jira
{"title":"Human-wildlife conflict: The case of Arjo Dhidhessa sugar factory and its surrounding, Western Ethiopia","authors":"Girma Gizachew, Gutema Jira","doi":"10.33292/areste.v1i2.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human-wildlife conflict (HWC) occurs in various forms throughout the world, with a greater influence in developing countries. This is due to fast increasing human populations and increased subsistence agriculture, which reduces wildlife habitat and increases human-wildlife interactions. Wild animals fight for resources with humans in the Arjo Dhidhesa Sugar Factory in Western Ethiopia, and they are in conflict with each other. As a result, this research was carried out to determine the reasons of HWC, as well as the mammals responsible for them. From August 2017 to March 2018, researchers utilized questioner and interview approaches to examine community perceptions toward wildlife and overall cthe result showed that a total of 99.034 sugarcane stalk damage events were registered in all three sample sites both during the dry and wet seasons. Wildlife consumed 46,468 sugarcane stalks during the rainy season, while 52,566 stalks were consumed during the dry season, with the documented damage event varying greatly from site to site. Hippopotamus, Anubis baboon, Warthog, Bush pig, and Buffalo were the most affected by HWC, with agricultural loss occurring throughout both wet and dry seasons. During the wet season, Hippopotamus 16,133 stalks per ha were the most damaged, followed by Anubis baboon 12,484 stalks per ha. Buffalo 5,083 and Bush pig 3,931 stalk per ha did the least damage, placing fourth and fifth, respectively. During dry seasons, Anubis baboon caused the most sugarcane stalk damage (16, 898 stalks per hectare), followed by hippopotamus (16,533 stalks per ha). During both the wet (t = 4.08, DF = 4, P< 0.05) and dry seasons (t =3.73, DF = 4, P< 0.05), there was a significant difference in the damages caused by mentioned fauna. According to the findings, about 67.9% and 25.2 % of all respondents said that HWC expressed itself in crop destruction and livestock predation, respectively. Habitat damage, agricultural development, a lack of feed, and a rise in the population of wild animals are among the explanations cited by respondents. Some of the key crop raider mitigation strategies revealed in this study that were adopted by the investment community and local communities include hanging dead animal parts, habitat disturbance, keeping animals alive by tying them to the side of field, and mass murdering wildlife. These practices are one of the main causes of the extinction of wildlife, making conservation even more challenging. There are currently many human activities in the field of science, which has resulted in many HWCs. As a result, investment decisions should be made based on strong and viable domain choices both commercial and environmental, as well as promoting natural tourism as a viable option for education and conservation education.","PeriodicalId":237717,"journal":{"name":"Applied Research in Science and Technology","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Research in Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33292/areste.v1i2.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human-wildlife conflict (HWC) occurs in various forms throughout the world, with a greater influence in developing countries. This is due to fast increasing human populations and increased subsistence agriculture, which reduces wildlife habitat and increases human-wildlife interactions. Wild animals fight for resources with humans in the Arjo Dhidhesa Sugar Factory in Western Ethiopia, and they are in conflict with each other. As a result, this research was carried out to determine the reasons of HWC, as well as the mammals responsible for them. From August 2017 to March 2018, researchers utilized questioner and interview approaches to examine community perceptions toward wildlife and overall cthe result showed that a total of 99.034 sugarcane stalk damage events were registered in all three sample sites both during the dry and wet seasons. Wildlife consumed 46,468 sugarcane stalks during the rainy season, while 52,566 stalks were consumed during the dry season, with the documented damage event varying greatly from site to site. Hippopotamus, Anubis baboon, Warthog, Bush pig, and Buffalo were the most affected by HWC, with agricultural loss occurring throughout both wet and dry seasons. During the wet season, Hippopotamus 16,133 stalks per ha were the most damaged, followed by Anubis baboon 12,484 stalks per ha. Buffalo 5,083 and Bush pig 3,931 stalk per ha did the least damage, placing fourth and fifth, respectively. During dry seasons, Anubis baboon caused the most sugarcane stalk damage (16, 898 stalks per hectare), followed by hippopotamus (16,533 stalks per ha). During both the wet (t = 4.08, DF = 4, P< 0.05) and dry seasons (t =3.73, DF = 4, P< 0.05), there was a significant difference in the damages caused by mentioned fauna. According to the findings, about 67.9% and 25.2 % of all respondents said that HWC expressed itself in crop destruction and livestock predation, respectively. Habitat damage, agricultural development, a lack of feed, and a rise in the population of wild animals are among the explanations cited by respondents. Some of the key crop raider mitigation strategies revealed in this study that were adopted by the investment community and local communities include hanging dead animal parts, habitat disturbance, keeping animals alive by tying them to the side of field, and mass murdering wildlife. These practices are one of the main causes of the extinction of wildlife, making conservation even more challenging. There are currently many human activities in the field of science, which has resulted in many HWCs. As a result, investment decisions should be made based on strong and viable domain choices both commercial and environmental, as well as promoting natural tourism as a viable option for education and conservation education.
人与野生动物的冲突:埃塞俄比亚西部Arjo Dhidhessa糖厂及其周边地区的案例
人类与野生动物冲突(HWC)在世界范围内以多种形式发生,在发展中国家影响更大。这是由于人口的快速增长和自给农业的增加,减少了野生动物栖息地,增加了人类与野生动物的互动。在埃塞俄比亚西部的Arjo Dhidhesa糖厂,野生动物与人类争夺资源,并相互冲突。因此,进行这项研究是为了确定HWC的原因,以及造成HWC的哺乳动物。从2017年8月到2018年3月,研究人员采用提问和访谈的方法来调查社区对野生动物的看法,总体结果显示,在旱季和雨季,所有三个样本地点共记录了99.034起甘蔗秸秆损害事件。野生动物在雨季消耗46,468根甘蔗秸秆,而在旱季消耗52,566根甘蔗秸秆,不同地点记录的损害事件差异很大。河马、阿努比斯狒狒、疣猪、丛林猪和水牛是受HWC影响最严重的动物,农业损失在干湿季节都有发生。在雨季,河马每公顷被破坏的茎杆数最多,为16,133根,其次是阿努比斯狒狒每公顷被破坏的茎杆数为12,484根。水牛(5083株)和布什猪(3931株)每公顷损失最小,分别排在第四和第五。在旱季,阿努比斯狒狒对甘蔗茎秆造成的损害最大(每公顷16,898茎),其次是河马(每公顷16,533茎)。在丰水期(t = 4.08, DF = 4, P< 0.05)和枯水期(t =3.73, DF = 4, P< 0.05),上述动物造成的损害有显著差异。调查结果显示,67.9%和25.2%的受访者表示,HWC分别表现为破坏作物和捕食牲畜。受访者引用的解释包括栖息地破坏、农业发展、饲料缺乏和野生动物数量增加。本研究揭示了投资界和当地社区采用的一些关键的作物掠夺者缓解策略,包括悬挂死去的动物部位、扰乱栖息地、通过将动物绑在田地边来保持动物的生命,以及大规模杀害野生动物。这些做法是野生动物灭绝的主要原因之一,使保护工作更具挑战性。目前在科学领域有许多人类活动,这导致了许多HWCs。因此,投资决策应基于强有力和可行的商业和环境领域选择,以及促进自然旅游作为教育和保护教育的可行选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信