Link calibration against receiver calibration time transfer uncertainty when using the Global Positioning System

G. Rovera, M. Abgrall, P. Uhrich, J. Torre, C. Courde, M. Laas-Bourez, R. Sherwood
{"title":"Link calibration against receiver calibration time transfer uncertainty when using the Global Positioning System","authors":"G. Rovera, M. Abgrall, P. Uhrich, J. Torre, C. Courde, M. Laas-Bourez, R. Sherwood","doi":"10.1109/EFTF.2014.7331534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a direct comparison between two different techniques for the relative calibration of time transfer between remote time scales when using the signals transmitted by the Global Positioning System (GPS). In the remote sites, the local measurements are driving either the computation of the hardware delays of the local GPS equipment with respect to a given reference GPS station, a “receiver” calibration, or the computation of a global hardware offset between two distribution reference points of the remote time scales, a “link” calibration. Both techniques do not require the same measurements on site, and we discuss the uncertainty budget computation differences. We report on one calibration campaign organized during Autumn 2013 between Observatoire de Paris (OP), Paris, France, Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur (OCA), Plateau de Calern, France, and NERC Space Geodesy Facility (SGF), Herstmonceux, United Kingdom. We show the different ways to compute uncertainty budgets, leading to improvement factors of 1.2 to 1.5 on the hardware delay uncertainties when comparing the relative link calibration to the relative receiver calibration.","PeriodicalId":129873,"journal":{"name":"2014 European Frequency and Time Forum (EFTF)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 European Frequency and Time Forum (EFTF)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EFTF.2014.7331534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We present a direct comparison between two different techniques for the relative calibration of time transfer between remote time scales when using the signals transmitted by the Global Positioning System (GPS). In the remote sites, the local measurements are driving either the computation of the hardware delays of the local GPS equipment with respect to a given reference GPS station, a “receiver” calibration, or the computation of a global hardware offset between two distribution reference points of the remote time scales, a “link” calibration. Both techniques do not require the same measurements on site, and we discuss the uncertainty budget computation differences. We report on one calibration campaign organized during Autumn 2013 between Observatoire de Paris (OP), Paris, France, Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur (OCA), Plateau de Calern, France, and NERC Space Geodesy Facility (SGF), Herstmonceux, United Kingdom. We show the different ways to compute uncertainty budgets, leading to improvement factors of 1.2 to 1.5 on the hardware delay uncertainties when comparing the relative link calibration to the relative receiver calibration.
使用全球定位系统时,根据接收机校准时间传递不确定度进行链路校准
利用全球定位系统(GPS)传输的信号,对两种不同的时间尺度间时间传递相对校准技术进行了直接比较。在远程站点,本地测量要么驱动本地GPS设备相对于给定参考GPS站的硬件延迟的计算,即“接收器”校准,要么驱动远程时间尺度的两个分布参考点之间的全球硬件偏移的计算,即“链路”校准。两种方法不需要相同的现场测量,并讨论了不确定度预算计算的差异。我们报告了2013年秋季在法国巴黎天文台(OP)、法国卡伦高原Côte蔚蓝天文台(OCA)和英国赫斯特蒙塞NERC空间大地测量设施(SGF)之间组织的一次校准活动。我们展示了计算不确定性预算的不同方法,当比较相对链路校准和相对接收器校准时,导致硬件延迟不确定性的改善因子为1.2到1.5。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信