Analysis of errors in solving mathematical literacy analysis problems using newman

Neneng Nuryati, S. Purwaningsih, Endang Habinuddin
{"title":"Analysis of errors in solving mathematical literacy analysis problems using newman","authors":"Neneng Nuryati, S. Purwaningsih, Endang Habinuddin","doi":"10.33122/ijtmer.v5i3.164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to find out student errors in solving problems about mathematical literacy. This study uses a qualitative research approach with sampling method is purposive sampling. The study subjects were three students who were taken based on KAM (Student Initial Ability), namely high, medium, and low ability categories. Each subject is one person per category from the Department of Accounting, Bandung State Polytechnic. This study analyzes student errors in solving mathematical literacy problems in the statistics course for the sub-discussion of hypothesis testing. The error analysis method used is Newman analysis. This study uses two instruments, namely a test instrument with four questions in the form of descriptions and interviews. The data will then be classified into five error categories according to Newman's analysis. The conclusions in this study indicate that there are errors in answering questions, especially for mathematical literacy questions; students are expected to be able to analyze questions in the form of story questions; Understanding the problem instructions and information contained in the problem is the first step in working on mathematical literacy problems so that the level of errors and errors in working on the questions is more resolved. Of the five errors that became the standard for Newman Error Analysis assessment, three errors were made by respondents, namely errors in understanding story questions correctly, errors in transforming story questions into mathematical sentences, and errors in writing the final answer.","PeriodicalId":280543,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v5i3.164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to find out student errors in solving problems about mathematical literacy. This study uses a qualitative research approach with sampling method is purposive sampling. The study subjects were three students who were taken based on KAM (Student Initial Ability), namely high, medium, and low ability categories. Each subject is one person per category from the Department of Accounting, Bandung State Polytechnic. This study analyzes student errors in solving mathematical literacy problems in the statistics course for the sub-discussion of hypothesis testing. The error analysis method used is Newman analysis. This study uses two instruments, namely a test instrument with four questions in the form of descriptions and interviews. The data will then be classified into five error categories according to Newman's analysis. The conclusions in this study indicate that there are errors in answering questions, especially for mathematical literacy questions; students are expected to be able to analyze questions in the form of story questions; Understanding the problem instructions and information contained in the problem is the first step in working on mathematical literacy problems so that the level of errors and errors in working on the questions is more resolved. Of the five errors that became the standard for Newman Error Analysis assessment, three errors were made by respondents, namely errors in understanding story questions correctly, errors in transforming story questions into mathematical sentences, and errors in writing the final answer.
用纽曼解题时的误差分析
本研究的目的是找出学生在解决数学素养问题时的错误。本研究采用定性研究方法,采用有目的抽样法。研究对象为三名学生,根据KAM(学生初始能力)分为高、中、低能力类别。每个科目由万隆国立理工学院会计系一人担任。本研究分析学生在统计课程中解答数学素养问题时的错误,以进行假设检验的子讨论。误差分析方法为Newman分析法。本研究使用两种工具,即一个测试工具,四个问题,以描述和访谈的形式。根据纽曼的分析,这些数据将被分为五个错误类别。本研究的结论表明:学生在回答问题时存在错误,特别是在数学素养问题上;学生应能以故事问题的形式分析问题;理解问题说明和问题中包含的信息是解决数学素养问题的第一步,以便更好地解决问题中的错误和错误程度。在成为纽曼错误分析评估标准的五个错误中,被调查者犯了三个错误,即正确理解故事问题的错误,将故事问题转化为数学句子的错误,以及书写最终答案的错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信