Dialogue and Self-Confrontation: A Study of Ahn Byung-Mu’s Minjung Theology of Religions

Kyeong II Jung
{"title":"Dialogue and Self-Confrontation: A Study of Ahn Byung-Mu’s Minjung Theology of Religions","authors":"Kyeong II Jung","doi":"10.58302/madang.2022..38.71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the 1970s and 80s, Korean Minjung theology and theology of religions(Inculturation theology) were in a tense relationship due to differences in their theological priorities. However, there was also a complementary relationship between the two theological movements in the Korean situation where the theological domination of the Western church and the political oppression of the military dictatorship were inseparably combined. Especially, Minjung theology, which included the minjung religious traditions of Korea as a theological paradigm, attempted a comparison and dialogue between religions from the beginning. Ahn Byung-mu, one of the founders of Minjung theology, was born and raised in a Confucian culture, and while studying abroad in Germany, he received a doctorate degree with a dissertation that compared the ren of Confucius with agape of Jesus. Also, he was interested in Buddhism and often wrote articles comparing Buddhism with Christianity. Throughout his theological journey, Ahn tried to overcome the subject-object dualism and personified understanding of God in Western theology through theological dialogue with Easter thought. More importantly, in his later years, Ahn applied the Eastern qi philosophy to understand the Holy Spirit. Though Ahn did not systematically theorize a theology of religions, he freely utilized the ideas of other faiths in constructing his theology in general and Minjung theology in particular. In addition, Ahn’s interreligious dialogue was conducted not only externally in his relationship with the religious other but also internally within his faith and theology. Therefore, in this article, I would like to explore the possibility of a Minjung theology of religions which is necessary for today’s religious pluralistic society by examining Ahn’s open, existential, and liberative understandings of other faiths.","PeriodicalId":166154,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Society of Minjung theology","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Society of Minjung theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58302/madang.2022..38.71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the 1970s and 80s, Korean Minjung theology and theology of religions(Inculturation theology) were in a tense relationship due to differences in their theological priorities. However, there was also a complementary relationship between the two theological movements in the Korean situation where the theological domination of the Western church and the political oppression of the military dictatorship were inseparably combined. Especially, Minjung theology, which included the minjung religious traditions of Korea as a theological paradigm, attempted a comparison and dialogue between religions from the beginning. Ahn Byung-mu, one of the founders of Minjung theology, was born and raised in a Confucian culture, and while studying abroad in Germany, he received a doctorate degree with a dissertation that compared the ren of Confucius with agape of Jesus. Also, he was interested in Buddhism and often wrote articles comparing Buddhism with Christianity. Throughout his theological journey, Ahn tried to overcome the subject-object dualism and personified understanding of God in Western theology through theological dialogue with Easter thought. More importantly, in his later years, Ahn applied the Eastern qi philosophy to understand the Holy Spirit. Though Ahn did not systematically theorize a theology of religions, he freely utilized the ideas of other faiths in constructing his theology in general and Minjung theology in particular. In addition, Ahn’s interreligious dialogue was conducted not only externally in his relationship with the religious other but also internally within his faith and theology. Therefore, in this article, I would like to explore the possibility of a Minjung theology of religions which is necessary for today’s religious pluralistic society by examining Ahn’s open, existential, and liberative understandings of other faiths.
对话与自我对抗:安秉武的民正宗教神学研究
在20世纪70年代和80年代,韩国的民正神学和宗教神学(本土化神学)由于各自的神学重点不同,关系紧张。然而,在朝鲜局势中,西方教会的神学统治与军事独裁的政治压迫不可分割地结合在一起,这两种神学运动之间也存在着互补关系。特别是以韩国民宗传统为神学范式的民宗神学,从一开始就试图进行宗教间的比较和对话。民宗神学的创始人之一安秉穆是在儒家文化中出生和成长的,在德国留学期间,他以将孔子的仁比作耶稣的爱的论文获得了博士学位。此外,他对佛教很感兴趣,经常写一些比较佛教和基督教的文章。在他的神学历程中,安哲秀试图通过与复活节思想的神学对话,克服西方神学中的主客体二元论和对上帝的人格化理解。更重要的是,安哲熙在晚年运用东方的气哲学来理解圣灵。虽然安哲秀没有系统地将宗教神学理论化,但他在构建自己的神学,特别是民宗神学时,自由地利用了其他信仰的思想。此外,安哲秀的宗教间对话不仅在外部表现为与宗教他者的关系,而且在内部表现为信仰和神学。因此,在这篇文章中,我想通过考察安哲秀对其他信仰的开放、存在和解放的理解,来探讨一种民宗宗教神学的可能性,这对于今天的宗教多元化社会是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书