{"title":"Loan Rate Differences Across Financial Sectors: A Mechanism Design Approach","authors":"Byoung-Ki Kim, Jun Gyu Min","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2878407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper shows that discrete and vastly different loan rates offered by different types of financial firms constitute, in fact, an elaborate mechanism that makes borrowers tell the truth regarding their ability to pay back loan principal and interest. Suppose that once a borrower fails to pay back a loan to a bank, he cannot borrow from any banks again and must contact higher-interest charging credit finance companies to get a new loan. This creates a well-defined incentive for borrowers: pay back and remain in the banks' loan market vs. do not pay back and move to, say, credit finance companies' loan market in which a higher loan rate is charged. This mechanism does not require the financial firms to verify even if the borrower declares bankruptcy, and therefore is more efficient than a standard debt contract A la Townsend (1979) in terms of verification cost. As the interest rates offered by different types of financial firms should be well aligned in order to prevent the deception of borrowers, we can also analyze how many different types of financial firms, that is, how many discrete and different loan rates, can co-exist in the economy.","PeriodicalId":208756,"journal":{"name":"BOK ERI: Working Paper Series (Topic)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BOK ERI: Working Paper Series (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2878407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper shows that discrete and vastly different loan rates offered by different types of financial firms constitute, in fact, an elaborate mechanism that makes borrowers tell the truth regarding their ability to pay back loan principal and interest. Suppose that once a borrower fails to pay back a loan to a bank, he cannot borrow from any banks again and must contact higher-interest charging credit finance companies to get a new loan. This creates a well-defined incentive for borrowers: pay back and remain in the banks' loan market vs. do not pay back and move to, say, credit finance companies' loan market in which a higher loan rate is charged. This mechanism does not require the financial firms to verify even if the borrower declares bankruptcy, and therefore is more efficient than a standard debt contract A la Townsend (1979) in terms of verification cost. As the interest rates offered by different types of financial firms should be well aligned in order to prevent the deception of borrowers, we can also analyze how many different types of financial firms, that is, how many discrete and different loan rates, can co-exist in the economy.
本文表明,不同类型的金融公司提供的离散且差异巨大的贷款利率实际上构成了一种精心设计的机制,使借款人说出有关其偿还贷款本金和利息能力的真相。假设一旦借款人不能偿还银行贷款,他就不能再从任何银行借款,必须联系利息更高的信用金融公司来获得新的贷款。这为借款人创造了一个明确的激励:偿还贷款并留在银行贷款市场,而不偿还贷款并转移到信贷金融公司的贷款市场,后者的贷款利率更高。即使借款人宣布破产,这种机制也不需要金融公司进行验证,因此在验证成本方面比标准债务合同更有效(a la Townsend(1979))。由于不同类型的金融公司提供的利率应该很好地一致,以防止借款人的欺骗,我们也可以分析有多少不同类型的金融公司,即有多少分立的和不同的贷款利率,可以在经济中共存。