Loan Rate Differences Across Financial Sectors: A Mechanism Design Approach

Byoung-Ki Kim, Jun Gyu Min
{"title":"Loan Rate Differences Across Financial Sectors: A Mechanism Design Approach","authors":"Byoung-Ki Kim, Jun Gyu Min","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2878407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper shows that discrete and vastly different loan rates offered by different types of financial firms constitute, in fact, an elaborate mechanism that makes borrowers tell the truth regarding their ability to pay back loan principal and interest. Suppose that once a borrower fails to pay back a loan to a bank, he cannot borrow from any banks again and must contact higher-interest charging credit finance companies to get a new loan. This creates a well-defined incentive for borrowers: pay back and remain in the banks' loan market vs. do not pay back and move to, say, credit finance companies' loan market in which a higher loan rate is charged. This mechanism does not require the financial firms to verify even if the borrower declares bankruptcy, and therefore is more efficient than a standard debt contract A la Townsend (1979) in terms of verification cost. As the interest rates offered by different types of financial firms should be well aligned in order to prevent the deception of borrowers, we can also analyze how many different types of financial firms, that is, how many discrete and different loan rates, can co-exist in the economy.","PeriodicalId":208756,"journal":{"name":"BOK ERI: Working Paper Series (Topic)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BOK ERI: Working Paper Series (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2878407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper shows that discrete and vastly different loan rates offered by different types of financial firms constitute, in fact, an elaborate mechanism that makes borrowers tell the truth regarding their ability to pay back loan principal and interest. Suppose that once a borrower fails to pay back a loan to a bank, he cannot borrow from any banks again and must contact higher-interest charging credit finance companies to get a new loan. This creates a well-defined incentive for borrowers: pay back and remain in the banks' loan market vs. do not pay back and move to, say, credit finance companies' loan market in which a higher loan rate is charged. This mechanism does not require the financial firms to verify even if the borrower declares bankruptcy, and therefore is more efficient than a standard debt contract A la Townsend (1979) in terms of verification cost. As the interest rates offered by different types of financial firms should be well aligned in order to prevent the deception of borrowers, we can also analyze how many different types of financial firms, that is, how many discrete and different loan rates, can co-exist in the economy.
金融部门间贷款利率差异:机制设计方法
本文表明,不同类型的金融公司提供的离散且差异巨大的贷款利率实际上构成了一种精心设计的机制,使借款人说出有关其偿还贷款本金和利息能力的真相。假设一旦借款人不能偿还银行贷款,他就不能再从任何银行借款,必须联系利息更高的信用金融公司来获得新的贷款。这为借款人创造了一个明确的激励:偿还贷款并留在银行贷款市场,而不偿还贷款并转移到信贷金融公司的贷款市场,后者的贷款利率更高。即使借款人宣布破产,这种机制也不需要金融公司进行验证,因此在验证成本方面比标准债务合同更有效(a la Townsend(1979))。由于不同类型的金融公司提供的利率应该很好地一致,以防止借款人的欺骗,我们也可以分析有多少不同类型的金融公司,即有多少分立的和不同的贷款利率,可以在经济中共存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信