Are Polish Public Companies 'Cooking the Books'? The Evidence from Annual Earnings Thresholds

J. Welc
{"title":"Are Polish Public Companies 'Cooking the Books'? The Evidence from Annual Earnings Thresholds","authors":"J. Welc","doi":"10.19030/IBER.V10I3.4104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Earnings management erodes the usefulness of financial statements, because the typical result of “cooking the books” is the occurrence of “earnings bubble” that bursts sooner or later, causing stock price to dive. This paper explores the presence of earnings management in the case of companies listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange in 2000-2009 period. We used the methodology based on two earnings thresholds: the negative / positive annual earnings threshold and the threshold between the decrease / increase of annual earnings. The research found that there is unusually low number of observations with the net margin between -1,5% and 0% and unusually high number of observations with the net margin between 0% and 2%, which suggests that companies with unmanaged earnings just below zero boost those earnings to the levels just above zero. The research also confirmed (although less strongly than in the case of negative / positive net margin threshold) the earnings management around zero earnings growth, which suggests that companies with unmanaged earnings that would show the small decline y/y boost those earnings in order to report the positive growth at the level just above zero.","PeriodicalId":355269,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Disclosure & Accounting Decisions (Topic)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Disclosure & Accounting Decisions (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19030/IBER.V10I3.4104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Earnings management erodes the usefulness of financial statements, because the typical result of “cooking the books” is the occurrence of “earnings bubble” that bursts sooner or later, causing stock price to dive. This paper explores the presence of earnings management in the case of companies listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange in 2000-2009 period. We used the methodology based on two earnings thresholds: the negative / positive annual earnings threshold and the threshold between the decrease / increase of annual earnings. The research found that there is unusually low number of observations with the net margin between -1,5% and 0% and unusually high number of observations with the net margin between 0% and 2%, which suggests that companies with unmanaged earnings just below zero boost those earnings to the levels just above zero. The research also confirmed (although less strongly than in the case of negative / positive net margin threshold) the earnings management around zero earnings growth, which suggests that companies with unmanaged earnings that would show the small decline y/y boost those earnings in order to report the positive growth at the level just above zero.
波兰上市公司是否在做假账?来自年收入阈值的证据
盈余管理削弱了财务报表的有用性,因为“做假账”的典型结果是“盈余泡沫”的出现,迟早会破裂,导致股价暴跌。本文以2000-2009年在华沙证券交易所上市的公司为例,探讨盈余管理的存在。我们使用了基于两个收益阈值的方法:负/正年度收益阈值和年度收益减少/增加之间的阈值。研究发现,净利润率在- 1.5%至0%之间的观察结果异常少,净利润率在0%至2%之间的观察结果异常多,这表明,非管理盈利略低于零的公司将其盈利提升至略高于零的水平。该研究还证实了(尽管不如净利润率为负/正阈值的情况那么强烈)盈利管理在零盈利增长附近,这表明,那些未经管理的盈利将显示出同比小幅下降的公司,为了在略高于零的水平上报告正增长,会提高这些盈利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信