PARESTHESIA-FREE SPINAL CORD STIMULATION OF THE S1 SPINAL NERVE ROOT FOR REFRACTORY SURAL NEURALGIA: A CASE REPORT

Viet L Cai
{"title":"PARESTHESIA-FREE SPINAL CORD STIMULATION OF THE S1 SPINAL NERVE\nROOT FOR REFRACTORY SURAL NEURALGIA: A CASE REPORT","authors":"Viet L Cai","doi":"10.36076/pmcr.2019/3/55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A 63-year-old man with a remote history of left ankle surgeries following traumatic injury, with resultant neuropathic pain secondary to sural nerve injury, was treated successfully with a left L5 DRG stimulator. He re-presents several years after a right Achilles tendon repair with resulting severe right posterolateral ankle pain. Based on the distribution of pain, a right sural nerve block was performed with > 75% relief of pain for 2 months. Cryoablations of the right sural nerve provided him with excellent pain relief for 5 months’ duration. For unclear reasons, the degree and duration of relief decreased with successive cryoablations. We then transitioned to right radiofrequency lesioning (pulsed RFL) L5 and S1 DRG with 90% relief of pain. During sensory stimulation, it was noted that the L5 DRG was discordant with his pain at the time of lesioning. For several years, the patient received serial S1 DRG RFLs, each with near complete relief lasting 4 to 8 months. Over this time period, the patient developed burning at the site of his implantable pulse generator (IPG) when the device was in the “on” mode only. The impression was that there was an electrical leak at the site where the lead inserts into the IPG. The decision was made to replace the existing IPG and add a lead over the S1 nerve root on the right, as close as possible to the DRG.","PeriodicalId":110696,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Case Reports","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36076/pmcr.2019/3/55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A 63-year-old man with a remote history of left ankle surgeries following traumatic injury, with resultant neuropathic pain secondary to sural nerve injury, was treated successfully with a left L5 DRG stimulator. He re-presents several years after a right Achilles tendon repair with resulting severe right posterolateral ankle pain. Based on the distribution of pain, a right sural nerve block was performed with > 75% relief of pain for 2 months. Cryoablations of the right sural nerve provided him with excellent pain relief for 5 months’ duration. For unclear reasons, the degree and duration of relief decreased with successive cryoablations. We then transitioned to right radiofrequency lesioning (pulsed RFL) L5 and S1 DRG with 90% relief of pain. During sensory stimulation, it was noted that the L5 DRG was discordant with his pain at the time of lesioning. For several years, the patient received serial S1 DRG RFLs, each with near complete relief lasting 4 to 8 months. Over this time period, the patient developed burning at the site of his implantable pulse generator (IPG) when the device was in the “on” mode only. The impression was that there was an electrical leak at the site where the lead inserts into the IPG. The decision was made to replace the existing IPG and add a lead over the S1 nerve root on the right, as close as possible to the DRG.
无感觉异常脊髓刺激s1脊神经根治疗难治性腓肠神经痛1例报告
一名63岁男性,外伤性左脚踝手术史,继发于腓肠神经损伤的神经性疼痛,使用左L5 DRG刺激器成功治疗。他在右跟腱修复后的几年内出现了严重的右踝关节后外侧疼痛。根据疼痛分布情况,行右侧腓肠神经阻滞,疼痛缓解> 75%,持续2个月。冷冻消融右腓肠神经为他提供了5个月的良好疼痛缓解。由于不清楚的原因,缓解的程度和持续时间随着连续冷冻消融而减少。然后我们过渡到右射频损伤(脉冲RFL) L5和S1 DRG,疼痛缓解90%。在感觉刺激时,我们注意到L5 DRG与他在病变时的疼痛不一致。几年来,患者接受了一系列S1 DRG rfl,每次几乎完全缓解持续4至8个月。在这段时间内,当植入式脉冲发生器(IPG)仅处于“打开”模式时,患者在植入式脉冲发生器(IPG)的部位出现灼烧。印象是在铅插入IPG的位置有电泄漏。我们决定替换现有的IPG,并在右侧S1神经根上增加一个导线,尽可能靠近DRG。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信