Teachers and researchers as co-designers? A design-based research on reading comprehension instruction in primary education

Suzanne T. M. Bogaerds-Hazenberg, J. Evers-Vermeul, H. van den Bergh
{"title":"Teachers and researchers as co-designers? A design-based research on reading comprehension instruction in primary education","authors":"Suzanne T. M. Bogaerds-Hazenberg, J. Evers-Vermeul, H. van den Bergh","doi":"10.15460/EDER.3.1.1399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Insights from scientific reading research only partially resonate in Dutch teaching materials for reading comprehension, and hence in the classroom. As an attempt to bridge the gap between science and educational practice, a design-based research was conducted in which four primary school teachers translated four researcher-provided design principles into practice. In two successive design cycles, the teachers designed and implemented lessons on informational text structures, under supervision of two researchers. The aim of the study was to gain insight into the viability of the design principles and into the level of support teachers need in order to become effective co-designers. Based on data from lesson artefacts, teacher logbooks, panel interviews and lesson observations, we found that the teachers experienced several implementation difficulties. These difficulties were partially due to the fact that there was a tension between two design principles, and that one design principle needed refinement. However, in most cases, the implementation difficulties could be explained by teachers’ limited pedagogical content knowledge. As a result, the teachers needed a high level of support, especially in text selection and revision. Teacher beliefs and habits also interfered with the implementation of the design principles, especially when it came to the importance of working with authentic texts, and teachers’ views on effective modeling.Our study raises questions about the feasibility of equal participation of researchers and teachers at the start of a DBR project, but also shows how DBR can successfully contribute to teacher professionalization if researchers provide adequate support throughout the design process.","PeriodicalId":145708,"journal":{"name":"EDeR. Educational Design Research","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDeR. Educational Design Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15460/EDER.3.1.1399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Insights from scientific reading research only partially resonate in Dutch teaching materials for reading comprehension, and hence in the classroom. As an attempt to bridge the gap between science and educational practice, a design-based research was conducted in which four primary school teachers translated four researcher-provided design principles into practice. In two successive design cycles, the teachers designed and implemented lessons on informational text structures, under supervision of two researchers. The aim of the study was to gain insight into the viability of the design principles and into the level of support teachers need in order to become effective co-designers. Based on data from lesson artefacts, teacher logbooks, panel interviews and lesson observations, we found that the teachers experienced several implementation difficulties. These difficulties were partially due to the fact that there was a tension between two design principles, and that one design principle needed refinement. However, in most cases, the implementation difficulties could be explained by teachers’ limited pedagogical content knowledge. As a result, the teachers needed a high level of support, especially in text selection and revision. Teacher beliefs and habits also interfered with the implementation of the design principles, especially when it came to the importance of working with authentic texts, and teachers’ views on effective modeling.Our study raises questions about the feasibility of equal participation of researchers and teachers at the start of a DBR project, but also shows how DBR can successfully contribute to teacher professionalization if researchers provide adequate support throughout the design process.
教师和研究人员共同设计?基于设计的小学阅读理解教学研究
科学阅读研究的见解在荷兰语阅读理解教材中只能产生部分共鸣,因此在课堂上也只能产生部分共鸣。为了弥合科学与教育实践之间的差距,我们进行了一项基于设计的研究,在这项研究中,四位小学教师将研究者提供的四条设计原则转化为实践。在两个连续的设计周期中,教师在两名研究人员的监督下设计和实施信息文本结构课程。这项研究的目的是深入了解设计原则的可行性,以及教师需要多少支持才能成为有效的合作设计师。基于课堂人工制品、教师日志、小组访谈和课堂观察的数据,我们发现教师在实施过程中遇到了一些困难。这些困难部分是由于两个设计原则之间存在紧张关系,其中一个设计原则需要改进。然而,在大多数情况下,实施困难可以解释为教师的教学内容知识有限。因此,教师需要高度的支持,特别是在文本选择和修改方面。教师的信念和习惯也干扰了设计原则的实施,特别是当涉及到使用真实文本的重要性,以及教师对有效建模的看法时。我们的研究提出了研究人员和教师在DBR项目开始时平等参与的可行性问题,但也表明,如果研究人员在整个设计过程中提供足够的支持,DBR如何成功地促进教师专业化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信