International Business Leadership, Culture, and GMAT Scores: Evidence and Implications

R. Aggarwal, Joanne E. Goodell, John W. Goodell
{"title":"International Business Leadership, Culture, and GMAT Scores: Evidence and Implications","authors":"R. Aggarwal, Joanne E. Goodell, John W. Goodell","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1920901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior literature has strongly affirmed the relationship between international business leadership and national culture. In addition, GMAT scores continue to be an important component of applications for admission to masters programs in business and are very important for managerial development in international business. However, like any standardized test, the GMAT favors narrow analytical skills often at the expense of broader leadership skills and GMAT scores may be unduly influenced by national culture. Given that there little prior literature in this area, we contribute by showing empirically that cultural differences have considerable influence on GMAT scores. Specifically, we document that GMAT scores are negatively related to the cultural dimensions of masculinity and power distance and are positively related to uncertainty avoidance and individualism. We estimate that cultural factors may account for as much as an 80-point difference in cross national mean GMAT scores and that they are also related negatively to national educational spending, wealth per capita, and women’s development. These findings have important implications for international business leadership and should be of interest to education scholars, business schools, and to managers interested in team work skills and corporate leadership.","PeriodicalId":435876,"journal":{"name":"Leadership Development eJournal","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership Development eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1920901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prior literature has strongly affirmed the relationship between international business leadership and national culture. In addition, GMAT scores continue to be an important component of applications for admission to masters programs in business and are very important for managerial development in international business. However, like any standardized test, the GMAT favors narrow analytical skills often at the expense of broader leadership skills and GMAT scores may be unduly influenced by national culture. Given that there little prior literature in this area, we contribute by showing empirically that cultural differences have considerable influence on GMAT scores. Specifically, we document that GMAT scores are negatively related to the cultural dimensions of masculinity and power distance and are positively related to uncertainty avoidance and individualism. We estimate that cultural factors may account for as much as an 80-point difference in cross national mean GMAT scores and that they are also related negatively to national educational spending, wealth per capita, and women’s development. These findings have important implications for international business leadership and should be of interest to education scholars, business schools, and to managers interested in team work skills and corporate leadership.
国际商业领导力,文化和GMAT成绩:证据和影响
先前的文献已经强烈肯定了国际商业领导力与国家文化之间的关系。此外,GMAT成绩仍然是申请商业硕士课程的重要组成部分,对国际商业的管理发展非常重要。然而,像任何标准化考试一样,GMAT倾向于狭隘的分析能力,往往以牺牲更广泛的领导能力为代价,GMAT分数可能会受到国家文化的过度影响。鉴于这方面的文献很少,我们通过实证证明文化差异对GMAT成绩有相当大的影响。具体来说,我们证明GMAT分数与男性气质和权力距离的文化维度负相关,与不确定性回避和个人主义正相关。我们估计,文化因素可能在GMAT的跨国平均分数中占80分之多,而且它们也与国家教育支出、人均财富和妇女发展负相关。这些发现对国际商业领导力具有重要意义,应该引起教育学者、商学院和对团队合作技能和企业领导力感兴趣的管理者的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信