The Ethical Responsibility of Companies Towards Animals: A Study of the Expressed Commitment of the Fortune Global 200

Monique R. E. Janssens, M. Kaptein
{"title":"The Ethical Responsibility of Companies Towards Animals: A Study of the Expressed Commitment of the Fortune Global 200","authors":"Monique R. E. Janssens, M. Kaptein","doi":"10.9774/gleaf.4700.2016.se.00005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reasonable arguments can be advanced to show that companies have an ethical responsibility towards animals. However, hardly any empirical research has been conducted to establish whether companies acknowledge these responsibilities and how they articulate them. This study shows that 47% of the 200 largest companies in the world make statements of ethical responsibility towards animals. The findings show great divergence in the expressed commitment towards animal welfare among these companies. Companies that express responsibility show quite a high level of concern in their words, but they do so in documents of relatively low importance. Statements regarding ethical responsibility for animal welfare are generally made in consequentialist terms. The results of this study show that it is high time for the fields of business ethics and animal ethics to start working more closely together.","PeriodicalId":429926,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Corporate Citizenship","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Corporate Citizenship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9774/gleaf.4700.2016.se.00005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Reasonable arguments can be advanced to show that companies have an ethical responsibility towards animals. However, hardly any empirical research has been conducted to establish whether companies acknowledge these responsibilities and how they articulate them. This study shows that 47% of the 200 largest companies in the world make statements of ethical responsibility towards animals. The findings show great divergence in the expressed commitment towards animal welfare among these companies. Companies that express responsibility show quite a high level of concern in their words, but they do so in documents of relatively low importance. Statements regarding ethical responsibility for animal welfare are generally made in consequentialist terms. The results of this study show that it is high time for the fields of business ethics and animal ethics to start working more closely together.
企业对动物的伦理责任:《财富》全球200强企业承诺的研究
可以提出合理的论据来证明公司对动物负有道德责任。然而,几乎没有任何实证研究来确定公司是否承认这些责任,以及它们是如何表达这些责任的。这项研究表明,世界上最大的200家公司中有47%发表了对动物的道德责任声明。调查结果显示,这些公司在表达对动物福利的承诺方面存在很大差异。企业在表达责任时,虽然在语言上表现出了高度的关注,但在相对不重要的文件上却表现出了高度的关注。关于动物福利的伦理责任的陈述通常是以结果主义的方式提出的。这项研究的结果表明,现在是商业伦理和动物伦理领域开始更紧密地合作的时候了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信