Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Strut Allograft and an Extensively Porous-Coated Femoral Stem

Kyung-Jae Lee, B. Min, K. Bae, C. Cho, Dong-Hu Kim
{"title":"Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Strut Allograft and an Extensively Porous-Coated Femoral Stem","authors":"Kyung-Jae Lee, B. Min, K. Bae, C. Cho, Dong-Hu Kim","doi":"10.5371/JKHS.2010.22.3.197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: We wanted to report on the outcomes of using a strut allograft and extensively porous-coated femoral stems in revision total hip arthroplasty that was performed due to extensive femoral bone loss. Materials and Methods: Between 1998 and 2005, we performed 167 consecutive revision total hip arthroplasties. Among them, twelve cementless femoral revision surgeries with a strut allograft and extensively porous-coated stems were retrospectively reviewed. The average follow up was 4.6 years. The average age at the time of the index revision was 55.9 years. The reasons for the revisions were periprosthetic fracture due to extensive osteolysis in 5 hips and aseptic loosening in 7 hips. Results: The Harris hip score improved from a mean of 40.8 points before revision surgery to a mean of 85.1 points at the latest follow up. Radiographic evidence of bony stable stems were present in 11 hips and a fibrous stable stem was present in 1 hip. Moderate stress-shielding was noticed in one hip. Nonunion of the allograft was observed in 1 hip due to deep infection. To date, no significant wear or osteolysis has been observed. Conclusion: Revision total hip arthroplasty with a strut allograft and an extensively porous-coated femoral stem for treating cases of extensive femoral bone loss seems to be a reasonable choice. However, the concerns related to stress shielding, the difficulties in re-revisions and the complications associated with an allograft will require longer term follow up.","PeriodicalId":410202,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Korean Hip Society","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Korean Hip Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5371/JKHS.2010.22.3.197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: We wanted to report on the outcomes of using a strut allograft and extensively porous-coated femoral stems in revision total hip arthroplasty that was performed due to extensive femoral bone loss. Materials and Methods: Between 1998 and 2005, we performed 167 consecutive revision total hip arthroplasties. Among them, twelve cementless femoral revision surgeries with a strut allograft and extensively porous-coated stems were retrospectively reviewed. The average follow up was 4.6 years. The average age at the time of the index revision was 55.9 years. The reasons for the revisions were periprosthetic fracture due to extensive osteolysis in 5 hips and aseptic loosening in 7 hips. Results: The Harris hip score improved from a mean of 40.8 points before revision surgery to a mean of 85.1 points at the latest follow up. Radiographic evidence of bony stable stems were present in 11 hips and a fibrous stable stem was present in 1 hip. Moderate stress-shielding was noticed in one hip. Nonunion of the allograft was observed in 1 hip due to deep infection. To date, no significant wear or osteolysis has been observed. Conclusion: Revision total hip arthroplasty with a strut allograft and an extensively porous-coated femoral stem for treating cases of extensive femoral bone loss seems to be a reasonable choice. However, the concerns related to stress shielding, the difficulties in re-revisions and the complications associated with an allograft will require longer term follow up.
支架异体移植物和广泛多孔包膜股干翻修全髋关节置换术
目的:我们想报道由于广泛的股骨骨丢失,在翻修全髋关节置换术中使用支撑异体移植物和广泛多孔包膜股骨柄的结果。材料和方法:1998年至2005年间,我们进行了167例连续翻修全髋关节置换术。其中,回顾性回顾了12例采用同种异体支撑移植物和广泛多孔涂层茎的无骨水泥股骨翻修手术。平均随访时间为4.6年。修正指数时的平均年龄为55.9岁。翻修的原因是5例髋部广泛骨溶解导致假体周围骨折,7例髋部无菌性松动。结果:Harris髋关节评分由翻修手术前的平均40.8分提高到最新随访时的平均85.1分。影像学证据显示11个髋部有骨性稳定的骨干,1个髋部有纤维性稳定的骨干。在一个髋部发现中度应力屏蔽。1例髋关节因深度感染导致同种异体移植物不愈合。到目前为止,没有观察到明显的磨损或骨溶解。结论:改良全髋关节置换术采用同种异体支撑移植物和广泛多孔包膜股骨干治疗大面积股骨骨丢失是一种合理的选择。然而,有关应力屏蔽、再修复的困难以及同种异体移植物相关并发症的担忧需要更长的随访时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信