Of Eunuchs and Predators: Matthew 19:1-12 in a Cultural Context

C. Bernabé
{"title":"Of Eunuchs and Predators: Matthew 19:1-12 in a Cultural Context","authors":"C. Bernabé","doi":"10.1177/014610790303300402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this essay I hold the view that the point at issue in Matthew 19:1-12 is less one of divorce and more of a contrast between two forms of wife-husband relationship within a marriage: one, the traditional form, and the other, an alternative form deriving from the values of the forthcoming Kingdom that Jesus proposes to his disciples. In that cultural context, male honor depended, among other things, on the type of relations men might have with theirs wives, something that was defined by the general code for masculinity. Deviations from the male role would lead to doubts about an individual's \"manliness,\" and even to his \"social or symbolic castration,\" and thus dishonor. In my opinion, Jesus' final paradoxical words (vv 10-12) must be understood in that light.","PeriodicalId":227137,"journal":{"name":"Biblical Theology Bulletin: A Journal of Bible and Theology","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biblical Theology Bulletin: A Journal of Bible and Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/014610790303300402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this essay I hold the view that the point at issue in Matthew 19:1-12 is less one of divorce and more of a contrast between two forms of wife-husband relationship within a marriage: one, the traditional form, and the other, an alternative form deriving from the values of the forthcoming Kingdom that Jesus proposes to his disciples. In that cultural context, male honor depended, among other things, on the type of relations men might have with theirs wives, something that was defined by the general code for masculinity. Deviations from the male role would lead to doubts about an individual's "manliness," and even to his "social or symbolic castration," and thus dishonor. In my opinion, Jesus' final paradoxical words (vv 10-12) must be understood in that light.
太监和掠食者:马太福音19:1-12在一个文化背景下
在这篇文章中,我认为马太福音19:1-12的争论点与其说是离婚,不如说是婚姻中两种形式的夫妻关系的对比:一种是传统的形式,另一种是来自耶稣向门徒提出的即将到来的王国的价值的另一种形式。在这种文化背景下,男性的荣誉,除了其他因素外,还取决于男性与妻子之间的关系,这是由男性气概的一般准则所定义的。偏离男性角色会导致对个人“男子气概”的怀疑,甚至导致他的“社会或象征性阉割”,从而导致耻辱。在我看来,耶稣最后的自相矛盾的话(10-12节)必须从这个角度来理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信