Deprescribing of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with COPD with mild or moderate airflow limitation: what do patients think?

G. Gilworth, T. Harries, M. Thomas, C. Corrigan, Patrick J. Murphy, N. Hart, Leslie A. Hamilton, P. White
{"title":"Deprescribing of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with COPD with mild or moderate airflow limitation: what do patients think?","authors":"G. Gilworth, T. Harries, M. Thomas, C. Corrigan, Patrick J. Murphy, N. Hart, Leslie A. Hamilton, P. White","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa5009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: GOLD guidelines support the prescription of high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (HD-ICS) in symptomatic COPD patients with frequent or severe exacerbations. HD-ICS are frequently prescribed outside guidelines with the risk of side effects. No investigation of patients’ views of HD-ICS withdrawal have been conducted. Aim: To assess the views of COPD patients with mild or moderate airflow limitation to the staged withdrawal of HD-ICS prescribed outside guidelines with a view to a trial in primary care. Methods: One-to-one semi-structured qualitative interviews exploring COPD patients’ opinions and feelings about using HD-ICS prescribed outside guidelines and their attitudes to proposed withdrawal. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was completed. Results: Seventeen eligible COPD patients were interviewed. Twenty six expressed interest. 7 did not meet spirometry eligibility criteria. Two were unable due to illness. Many participants were not aware they were using a HD-ICS or of the risk of side effects. Some were unconcerned by what they perceived as low individual risk. Others expressed fears of worsening symptoms on withdrawal. Most with mild or moderate airflow limitation would have been willing to attempt withdrawal or titration to a lower dose of HD-ICS if advised by their clinician especially if a reasoned explanation was offered. Conclusions: Attitudes to discontinuing HD-ICS use are varied and likely to be complex. Proposed deprescribing requires detailed conversations between patients and respiratory healthcare professionals including acknowledgement of possible limited understanding of the medication.","PeriodicalId":432006,"journal":{"name":"General practice and primary care","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General practice and primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa5009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: GOLD guidelines support the prescription of high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (HD-ICS) in symptomatic COPD patients with frequent or severe exacerbations. HD-ICS are frequently prescribed outside guidelines with the risk of side effects. No investigation of patients’ views of HD-ICS withdrawal have been conducted. Aim: To assess the views of COPD patients with mild or moderate airflow limitation to the staged withdrawal of HD-ICS prescribed outside guidelines with a view to a trial in primary care. Methods: One-to-one semi-structured qualitative interviews exploring COPD patients’ opinions and feelings about using HD-ICS prescribed outside guidelines and their attitudes to proposed withdrawal. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was completed. Results: Seventeen eligible COPD patients were interviewed. Twenty six expressed interest. 7 did not meet spirometry eligibility criteria. Two were unable due to illness. Many participants were not aware they were using a HD-ICS or of the risk of side effects. Some were unconcerned by what they perceived as low individual risk. Others expressed fears of worsening symptoms on withdrawal. Most with mild or moderate airflow limitation would have been willing to attempt withdrawal or titration to a lower dose of HD-ICS if advised by their clinician especially if a reasoned explanation was offered. Conclusions: Attitudes to discontinuing HD-ICS use are varied and likely to be complex. Proposed deprescribing requires detailed conversations between patients and respiratory healthcare professionals including acknowledgement of possible limited understanding of the medication.
轻度或中度气流受限慢性阻塞性肺病患者吸入糖皮质激素处方的解除:患者怎么看?
背景:GOLD指南支持高剂量吸入皮质类固醇(HD-ICS)用于频繁或严重加重的有症状的COPD患者。HD-ICS经常在指南之外使用,有副作用的风险。未对患者对HD-ICS停药的看法进行调查。目的:评估轻度或中度气流受限的COPD患者对指南外处方的HD-ICS分阶段停药的看法,以期在初级保健中进行试验。方法:一对一半结构化定性访谈,探讨COPD患者对使用外部指南规定的HD-ICS的看法和感受,以及他们对建议退出的态度。采访录音并逐字抄写。专题分析完成。结果:17例符合条件的COPD患者接受了访谈。26人表示有兴趣。7例不符合肺活量测定合格标准。两人因病不能参加。许多参与者并不知道他们正在使用HD-ICS或副作用的风险。一些人对他们所认为的低个人风险并不关心。其他人则表示担心戒断后症状会恶化。大多数轻度或中度气流受限的患者在临床医生的建议下,特别是在有合理解释的情况下,会愿意尝试停药或滴定至较低剂量的HD-ICS。结论:对停止使用HD-ICS的态度是多种多样的,可能是复杂的。建议开处方需要患者和呼吸保健专业人员之间进行详细的对话,包括承认可能对药物的理解有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信