PaperDiff: A Script Independent Automatic Method for Finding the Text Differences Between Two Document Images

R. Sitaram, Gopal Datt Joshi, S. Noushath, Pulkit Parikh, Vishal Gupta
{"title":"PaperDiff: A Script Independent Automatic Method for Finding the Text Differences Between Two Document Images","authors":"R. Sitaram, Gopal Datt Joshi, S. Noushath, Pulkit Parikh, Vishal Gupta","doi":"10.1109/DAS.2008.69","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we introduce a novel concept called {PaperDiff} and propose an algorithm to implement it. The aim of PaperDiff is to compare two printed (paper) documents using their images and determine the differences in terms of text inserted, deleted and substituted between them. This lets an end-user compare two documents which are already printed or even if one of which is printed (the other could be in electronic form such as MS-word *.doc file). The algorithm we have proposed for realizing PaperDiff is based on word image comparison and is even suitable for symbol strings and for any script/language (including multiple scripts) in the documents, where even mature optical character recognition (OCR) technology has had very little success. PaperDiff enables end-users like lawyers, novelists, etc, in comparing new document versions with older versions of them. Our proposed method is suitable even when the formatting of content is different between the two input documents, where the structures of the document images are different (for e.g., differing page widths, page structure etc). An experiment of PaperDiff on single column text documents yielded 99.2 % accuracy while detecting 135 induced differences in 10 pairs of documents.","PeriodicalId":423207,"journal":{"name":"2008 The Eighth IAPR International Workshop on Document Analysis Systems","volume":"500 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 The Eighth IAPR International Workshop on Document Analysis Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DAS.2008.69","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce a novel concept called {PaperDiff} and propose an algorithm to implement it. The aim of PaperDiff is to compare two printed (paper) documents using their images and determine the differences in terms of text inserted, deleted and substituted between them. This lets an end-user compare two documents which are already printed or even if one of which is printed (the other could be in electronic form such as MS-word *.doc file). The algorithm we have proposed for realizing PaperDiff is based on word image comparison and is even suitable for symbol strings and for any script/language (including multiple scripts) in the documents, where even mature optical character recognition (OCR) technology has had very little success. PaperDiff enables end-users like lawyers, novelists, etc, in comparing new document versions with older versions of them. Our proposed method is suitable even when the formatting of content is different between the two input documents, where the structures of the document images are different (for e.g., differing page widths, page structure etc). An experiment of PaperDiff on single column text documents yielded 99.2 % accuracy while detecting 135 induced differences in 10 pairs of documents.
PaperDiff:一种独立于脚本的自动查找两个文档图像之间文本差异的方法
在本文中,我们引入了一个新的概念,称为{PaperDiff},并提出了一个算法来实现它。PaperDiff的目的是比较两种印刷(纸质)文档,使用它们的图像,并确定它们之间在插入,删除和替换文本方面的差异。这允许最终用户比较两个已经打印的文档,甚至其中一个已经打印(另一个可以是电子形式,如MS-word *.doc文件)。我们提出的实现PaperDiff的算法基于单词图像比较,甚至适用于符号字符串和文档中的任何脚本/语言(包括多种脚本),即使是成熟的光学字符识别(OCR)技术也很少成功。PaperDiff让律师、小说家等终端用户能够比较新版本和旧版本的文档。即使两个输入文档的内容格式不同,其中文档图像的结构不同(例如,不同的页面宽度,页面结构等),我们提出的方法也适用。在单列文本文档中,PaperDiff检测出10对文档中的135个诱导差异,准确率达到99.2%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信