If Your Mind Can Grasp It, Your Hands Will Help

Simon Stusak, Moritz Hobe, A. Butz
{"title":"If Your Mind Can Grasp It, Your Hands Will Help","authors":"Simon Stusak, Moritz Hobe, A. Butz","doi":"10.1145/2839462.2839476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes a study comparing the information recall of participants using 2D and 3D physical visualizations. Specifically, it focuses on physical bar charts and evaluates the difference between a paper-based visualization and a version built with wooden blocks. We conducted a repeated measures study involving 16 participants in which we measured the recall of information immediately after the exploration and with a delay of one week. We used questionnaires and semi-structured interviews to obtain more information about the process of recall and participants' opinions whether and how the visualizations differ in their potential for memorizing information. The results point out that participants believe to remember the 3D visualizations better, but besides the recall of extreme values the quantitative data cannot completely verify this appreciation. Furthermore the results highlight that the in the study used physical interaction techniques are not able to compensate lacking visual differentiation. One surprising finding was the strong dependency of the different data sets on the recall performance.","PeriodicalId":422083,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2839462.2839476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

This paper describes a study comparing the information recall of participants using 2D and 3D physical visualizations. Specifically, it focuses on physical bar charts and evaluates the difference between a paper-based visualization and a version built with wooden blocks. We conducted a repeated measures study involving 16 participants in which we measured the recall of information immediately after the exploration and with a delay of one week. We used questionnaires and semi-structured interviews to obtain more information about the process of recall and participants' opinions whether and how the visualizations differ in their potential for memorizing information. The results point out that participants believe to remember the 3D visualizations better, but besides the recall of extreme values the quantitative data cannot completely verify this appreciation. Furthermore the results highlight that the in the study used physical interaction techniques are not able to compensate lacking visual differentiation. One surprising finding was the strong dependency of the different data sets on the recall performance.
如果你的大脑能抓住它,你的手也会帮上忙
本文描述了一项研究,比较了参与者使用二维和三维物理可视化的信息回忆。具体来说,它侧重于物理条形图,并评估基于纸张的可视化和用木块构建的可视化版本之间的差异。我们进行了一项涉及16名参与者的重复测量研究,我们在探索后立即测量了对信息的回忆,并延迟了一周。我们使用问卷调查和半结构化访谈来获得更多关于回忆过程的信息,以及参与者对视觉化是否以及如何影响他们记忆信息潜力的看法。结果表明,参与者认为对三维可视化图像的记忆效果更好,但除了对极值的回忆外,定量数据并不能完全证实这种欣赏。此外,研究结果强调,在研究中使用的物理交互技术无法弥补缺乏视觉分化。一个令人惊讶的发现是不同的数据集对召回性能的强烈依赖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信